Urinary diversion after cystectomy
Authors:
L. Jarolím
Published in:
Urol List 2008; 6(2): 53-59
Overview
Recently, orthotopic bladder replacement is performed in one half of patients after cystectomy – conduit is performed in one third of patients. In the remaining patients anal diversions and continent cutaneous diversions are performed.
If there are no early or late complications, an orthotopic bladder replacement is probably the best option of urinary diversion. Nevertheless, elderly patients tend to have worse continence due to muscular weakness. Long-term experience with follow-up periods more than 10 years demonstrates a sustained favorable voiding outcome with slightly increased incontinence rates depending on the increasing age of patients. The risk of hypercontinence has to be considered especially in female patients.
Conduits are suitable in patients in poor general condition and in patients with an increased risk of local recurrence or in patients scheduled to radiotherapy.
Recovery in patients with anal diversion is very prompt. Long intervals between micturitions allow the patients to sleep for a longer period of time or even without waking up early after the surgery.
Results of continent cutaneous diversion in elderly patients may be influenced by the level of self-service for self-cathererization. Urinary diversion using more sophisticated methods with many specific steps causes an increased risk of various complications.
The most appropriate diversion must be chosen, "tailored" for each patient. Functional results of any urinary diversion in appropriately selected patients are comparable and depend on careful cystectomy and subsequent meticulous reconstruction.
Key words:
urinary diversion, bladder substitution
Sources
1. Simon J. Ectopia vesicae (absence of the anterior walls of the bladder and pubis abdominal parieties); operation for directing the orifices of the ureters into the rectum; temporary success; subsequent death; autopsy. Lancet 1852; 2: 568–570.
2. Maydl K. Prvé případy radikálního léčení rozštěpeného měchýře. čas Lék čes 1894; 33: 337–343.
3. Maydl K. Neue Beobachtungen von Ureterenimplantaionen in die Flexura romana bei Ectopia vesicae. Wien med Wschr 1896; 46: 1241, 1333–1373.
4. Maydl K. Über eine neue Methode zur Ausführung der Jejunostomie und Gastroenterostomie. Wien med Wschr 1892; 42: 697–741.
5. Pawlík K. Exstirpace močového měchýře. čas Lék čes 1890; 29: 705–706.
6. Hradec E. Chirurgische Behandlung der Strahlenschäden an der weiblichen Harnblase. Urol Int 1962; 14: 89–110.
7. Jarolím L, Babjuk M, Hanuš T, Janský M, Skřivanová V. Ortotopická náhrada močového měchýře u ženy po cystektomii se zachováním funkční uretry. Rozhl Chir 1996; 75: 222–226.
8. L Jarolím L, Babjuk M, Hanuš T, Janský M. 20 orthotopic neobladders in females. Eur Urol 1996; 30(suppl2): 264.
9. Jarolím L, Babjuk M, Hanuš T, Janský M, Skřivanová V. Female urethra sparing cystectomy and orthotopic bladder replacement. Eur Urol 1997; 31(2): 173–177.
10. Bricker EM. Bladder substitution after pelvic evisceration. Surg Clin North Am 1950; 30: 1511–1521.
11. Thüroff JW, Alken P, Riedmiller H, Jacobi GH, Hohenfellner R. 100 cases of mainz-pouch (mixed augmentation ileum 'n zecum) for bladder augmentation and continent urinary diversion. World J Urol 1985; 3(3): 179–184.
12. Jarolím L. Kontinentní ileocékální měchýř (Mainz pouch). Rozhl chir 1988; 67: 625–632.
13. Hinman F jr. Pascal, Laplace and a length of bowel. J Urol (Paris) 1989; 95: 11–14.
14. Hautmann RE. The ileal neobladder to the female urethra. Urol Clin North Am 1997; 24: 827–835.
15. Jarolím L. Le Ducova implantace ureterů do neoveziky. Rozhl Chir 1989; 68: 714–717.
16. Skinner DG, Boyd SD, Lieskovsky G, Bennett C, Hopwood B. Lower urinary tract reconstruction following cystectomy: experience and results in 126 patients using the Kock ileal reservoir with bilateral ureteroileal urethrostomy. J Urol 1991; 146(3): 756–760.
17. Studer UE, Danuser H, Merz VW, Springer JP, Zingg EJ. Experience in 100 patients with an ileal low pressure bladder substitute combined with an afferent tubular isoperistaltic segment. J Urol 1995; 154(1): 49–56.
18. Jarolím L, Babjuk M. Biopsie prostatické uretry před radikální cystoprostatektomií a biopsie hrdla močového měchýře před radikální cystektomií. Endoskopie 1996; 5: 24–26.
19. Studer UE, Danuser H, Thalmann GN, Springer JP, Turner WH. Antireflux nipples or afferent tubular segments in 70 patients with ileal low pressure bladder substitutes: long-term results of a prospective randomized trial. J Urol 1996; 156(6): 1913–1917.
20. Studer UE, Danuser H, Hochreiter W, Springer JP, Turner WH, Zingg EJ. Summary of 10 years' experience with an ileal low-pressure bladder substitute combined with an afferent tubular isoperistaltic segment. World J Urol 1996; 14(1): 29–39.
21. Elmajian DA, Stein JP, Esrig D, Frieman JA, Skinner EC, Boyd SD, Lieskovsky G, Skinner DG. The Kock ileal neobladder: updated experience in 295 male patients. J Urol 1996; 156(3): 920–925.
22. Ghoneim MA, Shaaban AA, Mahran MR, Kock NG. Further experience with the urethral Kock pouch. J Urol 1992; 147(2): 361–365.
23. Smith E, Yoon J, Theodorescu D. Evaluation of urinary continence and voiding function: early results in men with neo-urethral modification of the Hautmann orthotopic neobladder. J Urol 2001; 166: 1346– 1349.
24. Ghoneim MA. Orthotopic bladder substitution in women following cystectomy for bladder cancer. Urol Clin North Am 1997; 24(1): 225–239.
25. Jarolím L, Babjuk M, Hanuš T, Janský M. Maturition of the bladder replacement in the female. Brit J Urol 1997; 80: 343.
26. Jarolím L, Babjuk M, Hanuš T, Janský M, Grim M, Naňka O, Povýšil C. Treatment of urinary retention in females with the orthotopic bladder replacement. Eur Urol 1999; 35: 106.
27. Jarolím L, Babjuk M, Hanuš T, Janský M, Grim M, Naňka O, Povýšil C. Functional evaluation of orthotopic bladder replacement in females. Eur Urol 2000; 37(suppl2): 455.
28. Jarolím L, Babjuk M, Pecher M, Grim M, Naňka O, Tichý M, Hanuš T, Janský M. Causes and treatment of residual urine volume after orthotopic bladder replacement in women. Eur Urol 2000; 38(6): 748–752.
29. Jarolim L, Stenzl A, Coloby P, Golia S, Babjuk M, Bartsch G, Kakizoe T, Robertson Ch. Functional and urodynamic outcomes in orthotopic urinary diversion in women - multiinstitutional study. Eur Urol 2001; 39(5): 72.
30. Jarolim L, Babjuk M, Stenzl A, Bartsch G, Coloby P, Golia S, Kakizoe T, Robertson Ch. Multicentric study on functional and urodynamic outcomes in orthotopic urinary diversion in females with pelvic malignancy. J Urol 2001; 165(87): 353.
31. Stenzl A, Jarolim L, Coloby P, Golia S, Bartsch G, Babjuk M, Robertson Ch. Urethra-sparing cystectomy and orthotopic urinary diversion in women with malignant pelvic tumors. Cancer 2001; 92: 1865–1871.
32. Stenzl A, Jarolim L, Coloby P, Golia S, Bartsch G, Babjuk M, Robertson Ch. European experience with urethra-sparing cystectomy and orthotopic urinary diversion in women: oncological outcome. Eur Urol 2001; 39(5): 145.
33. Stenzl A, Bartsch G, Jarolím L, Babjuk M, Coloby P, Golia S, Robertson Ch. Kakizoe T. Oncological outcome in women with an orthotopic neobladder to the urethra. J Urol 2001; 165(87): 356
34. Jarolím L, Babjuk M, Hanuš T, Janský M, Skřivanová V. Kontinentní močová derivace s použitím detubulizovaného rektosigmatu (sigma-rectum pouch). čas Lék čes 1996; 135: 664–667.
35. Mitrofanoff P. Cystostomie continent transappendiculaire dans le traitement des vessies neurologiques. Chir Pediatr 1980; 21: 297–305.
36. Monti PR, Lara RC, Dutra MA, de Carvalho JR. New techniques for construction of efferent conduits based on the Mitrofanoff principle. Urology 1997; 49: 112–114.
37. Goodwin WE, Harris AP, Kaufman JJ, Beal JM. Open, transcolonic ureterointestinal anastomosis; new approach. Surg Gynekol Obstet 1953; 97: 295–300.
38. Hohenfellner R. Ureterosigmoidostomy - Revisite. Akt Urol 1990; 21: 63–66.
39. Fisch M, Hohenfellner R. Der Sigma-Rektum Pouch: eine Modifikation der Harnleiterdarmimplantation. Akt Urol 1991; 22: 1–9.
40. Fisch M, Wammack R, Mueller SC, Hohenfellner R. The MAINZ pouch II (Sigma-rectum pouch) J Urol 1993; 149(2): 258–263.
41. Jarolím L, Babjuk M, Hanuš T, Janský M, Skřivanová V. Kontinentní močová derivace s použitím detubulizovaného rektosigmatu (sigma-rectum pouch) čas Lék čes 1996; 135: 664–667.
42. Jarolím L, Babjuk M, Hanuš T, Janský M. One layer suture in Mainz pouch II - 50 cases. Eur Urol 1996, 30: 755.
43. Gumus E, Miroglu C, Saporta L, Basaran G, Horasanli K, Tanriverdi O, Karadag H. Rectodynamic and radiological assessment in modified mainz pouch II cases. Eur Urol 2000; 38(3): 316–322.
44. Pajor L, Kelemen Z. Our experience with the Mainz pouch II: 40 patients; follow-up and complications. Ann Urol (Paris) 1995; 29(4): 246–9.
45. Fisch M, Wammack R, Hohenfellner R. The sigma- rectum pouch (Mainz pouch II). World J Urol 1996; 14: 68–72.
46. Öbek C, Kural AR, Ataus S, Coskuner E, Demirkesen O, Çitçi A, Önder AU, Solok V: Complications of the Mainz Pouch II (Sigma-Rectum Pouch). E Urol 2001; 39(2): 204–211.
47. Hadzi-Djokic JB, Basic DT. A modified sigma-rectum pouch (Mainz pouch II) technique: analysis of outcomes and complications on 220 patients. BJU International 2006; 97(3): 587–591.
48. Kawaciuk I, Jarolím L. Motolský „sigma - rectum pouch“. In: Abrahámová J. Vybrané otázky onkologie VI. Praha: Galén 2002: 40.
49. Jarolím L, Schmidt M, Hyršl L, Hanek P, Dušek P, Rejchrt M, Kaliská V, Chocholatý M, Kawaciuk I. Rekonvalescence pacientů po derivaci Motol-pouch. In: Abrahámová J. Vybrané otázky onkologie X. Praha: Galén 2006: 21–23.
50. Hinman F, Weyrauch HM. A critical study of the different principles of surgery which have been used in ureterointestinal implantation. Trans Am Assoc Genitourin Surg 1936; 29: 15–156.
51. Montie JE. Ileal conduit diversion after radical cystectomy: pro. Urology 1997; 49: 659–662.
52. Hirokawa M, Iwasaki A, Yamazaki A, Asakura S, Nozaki A, Yamagishi T. Improved technique of tubeless cutaneous ureterostomy and results of permanent urinary diversion. Eur Urol 1989; 16(2): 125–132.
53. Puppo P, Perachino M, Ricciotti G, Bozzo V. Laparoscopic bilateral cutaneous ureterostomy for palliation of ureteral obstruction caused by advanced pelvic cancer. J Endourol 1994; 8: 425–428.
54. Jarolím L, Babjuk M, Hanuš T, Novák K. Komplikace močové derivace po cystektomii pro karcinom měchýře. Rozhl Chir 1997; 76: 425–428.
55. Stampfer DS, McDougal WS. Inhibition of the sodium/hydrogen antiport by ammonium ion. J Urol 1997; 157(1): 362–365.
56. Jarolím L, Horák L, Marek J. Adenokarcinom ureteroenetrické anastomózy a úloha endoskopie v mezioborové spolupráci. Endoskopie 1992; 1: 11–12.
57. Arnett TR, Dempster DW. Effect of pH on bone resorption by rat osteoclasts in vitro. Endocrinology 1986; 119: 119–124.
58. Lee SW, Russell J, Avioli LV. 25-Hydroxycholecalciferol to 1,25-dihydroxycholecalciferol: conversion impaired by systemic metabolic acidosis. Science 1977; 195(4282): 994–996.
59. Bettice JA, Gamble JL. Skeletal buffering of acute metabolic acidosis. Am J Physiol 1975; 229(6): 1618–1624.
60. McDougal WS, Koch MO, Shands C. Bony demineralization following urinary intestinal diversion. J Urol 1988; 140(4): 853–855.
61. Bushman W, Howards SS. The use of urea for dissolution of urinary mucus in urinary tract reconstruction. J Urol 1994; 151(4): 1036–1037.
62. Hautman RE, Abol-Enein H, Hafez K, Haro I, Mansson W, Mills RD, Montie JD, Sagalowski IA, Stein JP, Stenzl A, Studer UE, Volkmer BG. Urinary diversion. Urology 2007; 69(suppl1): 17–49.
63. Madersbacher S, Studer UE. Contemporary cystectomy and urinary diversion. World J Urol 2002; 20(3): 151–157.
Labels
Paediatric urologist UrologyArticle was published in
Urological Journal
2008 Issue 2
Most read in this issue
- Non-invasive blader cancer carcinoma – when should we start adjuvant intravesical instillation therapy and what to do in case of failure?
- Urinary diversion after cystectomy
- Complications of cystectomy and urinary diversion
- Sexual function sparing radical cystectomy