Authors: M. Srp 1; A. Carbajo 2; K. Dvořáková 1; A. Irving 2; Pracovní Skupina E.X.P.A.N.D. Authors‘ workplace: Neurologická klinika 1. LF UK a VFN v Praze 1; Klinika rehabilitace a tělovýchovného lékařství 2. LF UK a FN Motol a Homolka, Praha 2 Published in: Rehabil. fyz. Lék., 105, 2025, No. 3, pp. 105-112. Category: Original Papers doi: https://doi.org/10.48095/ccrhfl2025105
Objective: This cross-sectional survey aimed to map out the current practice of respiratory physiotherapy (RPT) in the Czech Republic, identify key barriers and facilitators to RPT delivery, and assess interest in establishing a network of trained respiratory physiotherapists. Methods: A questionnaire (12 closed and 2 open-ended questions) was distributed via REDCap (June–July 2025) using a snowball sampling method. Eligible respondents were physiotherapists with any postgraduate training and active use of RPT. Descriptive statistics, such as Pearson’s χ² test with Cramer’s V, and Spearman’s ρ were applied; open-ended responses were thematically categorized. Results: A total of n = 183 responses were analyzed. RPT was performed regularly by 50.3% and occasionally by 49.7% of respondents. Annually, > 50 patients were treated by 44.8% of physiotherapists. Hospital-based settings reported higher annual patient volumes than other workplaces (χ²3 = 19.5; p < 0.001; V = 0.35). Self-reported RPT knowledge correlated with annual patient volume (ρ = 0.39; p < 0.001). Use of airway clearance devices was more frequent in Prague than in the rest of the country (χ²2 = 7.2; p = 0.03; V = 0.20). The most common barriers to active provision of RPT were low physician awareness of RPT benefits (47.8%), insufficient professional networking (42.8%), and lack of time/capacity for patients (36.1%). Key expectations from a potential national RPT network included professional courses, workshops, webinars, supervision, internships (85.7%), regular sharing of updates and new findings (76.9%), and the creation and updating of methodological materials (69.8%). Interest in joining the emerging network was expressed by 36.1% of respondents (an additional 37.7% answered “maybe”). Conclusion: The data support the plan to establish and develop a national network of experts in RPT.
Respiratory system – physical therapy modalities – physical therapist – continuity of patient care
1. Rochester CL, Fairburn C, Crouch RH. Pulmonary rehabilitation for respiratory disorders other than chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Clin Chest Med 2014; 35(2): 369–389. doi: 10.1016/j.ccm.2014.02.016.
2. Rochester CL, Vogiatzis I, Holland AE et al. An official American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society policy statement: enhancing implementation, use, and delivery of pulmonary rehabilitation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2015; 192(11): 1373–1386. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201510-1966ST.
3. NHS England. Pulmonary rehabilitation commissioning standards. 2024. [online]. Available from: https://www.england.nhs.uk/long-read/pulmonary-rehabilitation-commissioning-standards/.
4. Bloem BR, Rompen L, Vries NM et al. ParkinsonNet: a low-cost health care innovation with a systems approach from the Netherlands. Health Aff 2017; 36(11): 1987–1996. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.0832.
5. Keus SH, Oude Nijhuis LB, Nijkrake MJ et al. Improving community healthcare for patients with Parkinson’s disease: the dutch model. Parkinsons Dis 2012; 2012 : 543426. doi: 10.1155/2012/543426.
6. Gal O, Srp M, Konvalinkova R et al. Physiotherapy in Parkinson’s disease: building ParkinsonNet in Czechia. Parkinsons Dis 2017; 2017 : 8921932. doi: 10.1155/2017/8921932.
7. Neumannová K, Zatloukal J, Koblížek V et al. Doporučený postup plicní rehabilitace. [online]. Dostupné z: https://www.unify-cr.cz/uploads/page/26/doc/doporuceny-postup-plicni-rehabilitace.pdf.
8. Patel N, Howard IM, Baydur A. Respiratory considerations in patients with neuromuscular disorders. Muscle Nerve 2023; 68(2): 122–141. doi: 10.1002/mus.27845.
9. Rochester CL, Alison JA, Carlin B et al. Pulmonary rehabilitation for adults with chronic respiratory disease: an official American Thoracic Society clinical practice guideline. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2023; 208(4): e7–e26. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202306-1066ST.
10. Byrwa DJ, Perez GF, Roach CM et al. Airway clearance therapy in the school environment: Retrospective analysis of a cohort of pediatric patients with cystic fibrosis. J Cyst Fibros 2023; 22(5): 811–815. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2023.01.006.
11. Neumannová K, Doušová T, Sedlák V et al. Doporučený postup České pneumologické a ftizeologické společnosti a České společnosti dětské pneumologie pro dlouhodobou domácí léčbu poruch expektorace pomocí přístroje CoughAssist. Cesk Slov Neurol N 2017; 80(4): 480–484. doi: 10.14735/amcsnn2017480.
12. Chatwin M, Wakeman RH. Mechanical insufflation-exsufflation: considerations for improving clinical practice. J Clin Med 2023; 12(7): 2626. doi: 10.3390/jcm12072626.
13. Matys V. ParkinsonCare v České republice: nová éra fyzioterapie Parkinsonovy nemoci. Olomouc, 2025. Diplomová práce. Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci, Fakulta zdravotnických věd. Vedoucí práce: Ing. Marek Šturek, MBA.
Don‘t have an account? Create new account
Enter the email address that you registered with. We will send you instructions on how to set a new password.
