-
Medical journals
- Career
Contact Hypersensitivity to Allergens Contained in Cosmetic Products - ReactionsAssessed by European Standard Allergen Set
Authors: A. Vocilková 3; M. Žemličková 1; Z. Kulíková 2
Authors‘ workplace: Dermatovenerologická klinika 1. LF UK a VFN, Praha přednosta doc. MUDr. Jiří Štork, CSc. 2Dermatovenerologická klinika 3. LF UK a FNKV, Praha přednosta prof. MUDr. Petr Arenberger, DrSc. 3Kožní ordinace, Poliklinika, Pod Marjánkou 12, Praha 1
Published in: Čes-slov Derm, , 2004, No. 2, p. 54-58
Category:
Overview
In 2002, 945 patients (241 men and 704 women) were tested with the basic allergen set in threedermatology clinics providing diagnostic contact allergy service for Prague referal area. The authorsevaluated only substances with possible relationship to contact allergy to cosmetic products. Fromthe total of 945 patients, 173 (18.3%) - 42 men (17.4% of the total number of tested men) and 131 women(18.6% of the total number of tested women) - reacted to at least one selected substance. The mostcommon hypersensitivities represented mixture of fragrances (74 positivities - i.e. 7.8% of tested),peru balsam (52 positivities - i.e. 5.5% of tested), lanolin (36 positivities - i.e. 3.8% of tested),formaldehyde (22 positivities - i.e. 2.3% of tested), colophony (18 positivities - i.e. 1.9% of tested),5-chloro-2-methyl-4-isothiasoline-3-one + 2-methyl4-isothiasoline-3-one (MCI/MI) (9 positivities - i.e.0.95% of tested), quaternium 15 (8 positivities - i.e. 0.85% of tested) and parabens (7 positivities - i.e.0.74% of tested). These findings demonstrate, that the most common origin of sensibilisation incosmetic products are fragrances and conservants. Relatively frequent positive reaction to lanolincan be explained by sensibilisation secondary to application of topical remedies - ointments andcreams - containing lanolin. The sensibilisation to cosmetics correlates closely with an exposition rate. Cosmetics producersuse time proven formulas, but there are also newly appearing substances, which, with large extentof use, can become significant for contact allergy development. As safe, according the literature dataconcerning the cosmetic conservants reactions monitoring, are considered only those substances towhich hypersensitivity does not exceed 1%; contact allergy in 2% of tested is considered alarmingand values over 3%, as a rule, mean serious problem.
Key words:
contact allergy - cosmetics - european standard allergen set
Labels
Dermatology & STDs Paediatric dermatology & STDs
Article was published inCzech-Slovak Dermatology
2004 Issue 2-
All articles in this issue
- Contact Hypersensitivity to Allergens Contained in Cosmetic Products - ReactionsAssessed by European Standard Allergen Set
- Risk of Liver Damage Caused by Modern Systemic Antimycotics
- Fibrous and Fibrohistiocytic Skin Tumors: Clinical Cases of Atypical (Pseudosarcomatous)Benign Fibrous Histiocytoma and Atypical Fibroxanthoma
- Primary Cutaneous Follicular Center Cell Lymphoma
- New Approaches to Evaluation of a Toxicological Profile of Cosmetic Productsand their Components
- Czech-Slovak Dermatology
- Journal archive
- Current issue
- Online only
- About the journal
Most read in this issue- Risk of Liver Damage Caused by Modern Systemic Antimycotics
- Fibrous and Fibrohistiocytic Skin Tumors: Clinical Cases of Atypical (Pseudosarcomatous)Benign Fibrous Histiocytoma and Atypical Fibroxanthoma
- Primary Cutaneous Follicular Center Cell Lymphoma
- Contact Hypersensitivity to Allergens Contained in Cosmetic Products - ReactionsAssessed by European Standard Allergen Set
Login#ADS_BOTTOM_SCRIPTS#Forgotten passwordEnter the email address that you registered with. We will send you instructions on how to set a new password.
- Career