#PAGE_PARAMS# #ADS_HEAD_SCRIPTS# #MICRODATA#

THE IMPACT OF AMELOGENESIS IMPERFECTA ON DENTAL HYGIENE AND PSYCHOSOCIAL WELL-BEING: PILOT STUDY


Authors: D. Vařejčko 1,2,3,4,5;  K. Valachová 1,2,3;  J. Vašáková 1,2,3,4,5;  W. Urbanová 1,2,3,4,5;  J. Borovec 1,2,3,4,5;  P. Poláčková 1,2,3,4,5,*
Authors‘ workplace: Korespondující autorka *;  Stomatologická klinika, 3. lékařská fakulta, Univerzita Karlova, Praha 1;  Stomatologická klinika, Fakultní nemocnice Královské Vinohrady, Praha 2;  Rozštěpové centrum Praha při Fakultní nemocnici Královské Vinohrady 3;  Stomatologická klinika, Lékařská fakulta v Plzni, Univerzita Karlova 4;  Stomatologická klinika, Fakultní nemocnice Plzeň, *Korespondující autorka 5
Published in: Česká stomatologie / Praktické zubní lékařství, ročník 126, 2026, 2, s. 31-39
Category: Original articles

Overview

Introduction and aim: Amelogenesis imperfecta (AI) is a genetic disorder of enamel development that negatively affects the structure and appearance of teeth.
The irregular surfaces of affected teeth act as plaque-retentive sites and may adversely impact periodontal health. The well-being of patients with AI is often compromised due to dental hypersensitivity and aesthetic deficits, particularly in the visible regions of the dentition. The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate the impact of AI on periodontal health, oral hygiene status, dental hypersensitivity, and patients’ quality of life.

Methods: The pilot study included 20 patients (10 with AI, 10 without dental impairment), matched for age and gender. Periodontal health and oral hygiene were assessed using the Papilla Bleeding Index (PBI) and the Quigley-Hein Index (QHI). Quality of life and dental hypersensitivity were evaluated using a PROM questionnaire. Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann-Whitney U test with a significance level at 5% (p < 0.05).

Results: Patients with AI showed a significantly higher PBI (p = 0.02) and lower oral health-related quality of life according to the PROM questionnaire (p = 0.004). Dental hypersensitivity was markedly higher in AI patients
(p = 0.005). Descriptive statistics indicated poorer oral hygiene levels in AI patients; however, the difference in QHI did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.14).

Conclusion: The study confirmed that AI negatively affects oral hygiene status and increases dental hypersensitivity, which in turn results in poorer quality of life. Although the difference in QHI between groups was not statistically significant, regular professional oral hygiene and psychosocial support remain essential.
The findings highlight the need for comprehensive care in patients with AI.

Keywords:

amelogenesis imperfecta, dental enamel, gingivitis, dental plaque, dental hypersensitivity, OHRQoL


Sources

1. Aldred M, Savarirayan R, Crawford P. Amelogenesis imperfecta: a classification and catalogue for the 21st century. Oral Dis. 2003; 9(1): 19–23. doi: 10.1034/j.1601-0825.2003.00843.x

2. Bäckman B, Holm AK. Amelogenesis imperfecta: prevalence and incidence in a northern Swedish county. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1986; 14(1): 43–47. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1986.tb01493.x

3. Witkop CJ. Hereditary defects in enamel and dentin. Hum Hered. 1957; 7(1): 236–239. doi: 10.1159/000150974

4. Witkop CJ. Amelogenesis imperfecta, dentinogenesis imperfecta and dentin dysplasia revisited: problems in classification. J Oral Pathol. 1988; 17(9–10): 547–553. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0714.1988.tb01332.x

5. Wang CI, Sinada N, Schoenbaum TR. The dental management and prosthodontic reconstruction of patients with amelogenesis imperfecta: A narrative review. Dent Rev. 2024; 4(1): 100080. doi: 10.1016/j.dentre.2024.100080

6. Kammoun R, Zmantar T, Labidi A, Abbes I, Mansour L, Ghoul-Mazgar S. Dental caries and hypoplastic amelogenesis imperfecta_ Clinical, structural, biochemical and molecular approaches. 2019; 135 : 103615. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2019.103615

7. Wang C, Zhao Y, Zheng S, Xue J, Zhou J, Tang Y, et al. Effect of enamel morphology on nanoscale adhesion forces of streptococcal bacteria: An AFM study. Scanning. 2015; 37(5): 313–321. doi: 10.1002/sca.21218

8. Quirynen M. The clinical meaning of the surface roughness and the surface free energy of intra-oral hard substrata on the microbiology of the supra -⁠ and subgingival plaque: results of in vitro and in vivo experiments. J Dent. 1994; 22, Suppl 1: S13–16.
doi: 10.1016/0300-5712(94)90165-1

9. Toupenay S, Fournier BP, Manière MC, Ifi-Naulin C, Berdal A, de La Dure-Molla M. Amelogenesis imperfecta: therapeutic strategy from primary to permanent dentition across case reports. BMC Oral Health. 2018; 18(1): 108. doi: 10.1186/s12903-018-0554-y

10. Quandalle C, Boillot A, Fournier B, Garrec P, de LA Dure-Molla M, Kerner S. Gingival inflammation, enamel defects, and tooth sensitivity in children with amelogenesis imperfecta: a case-control study. J Appl Oral Sci Rev FOB. 2020; 28: e20200170.
doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2020-0170

11. Pousette Lundgren G, Morling Vestlund GI, Trulsson M, Dahllöf G. A randomized controlled trial of crown therapy in young individuals with amelogenesis imperfecta. J Dent Res. 2015; 94(8): 1041–1047. doi: 10.1177/0022034515584385

12. Parekh S, Almehateb M, Cunningham SJ. How do children with amelogenesis imperfecta feel about their teeth? Int J Paediatr Dent. 2014; 24(5): 326–335. doi: 10.1111/ipd.12080

13. Coffield KD, Phillips C, Brady M, Roberts MW, Strauss RP, Wright JT. The psychosocial impact of developmental dental defects in people with hereditary amelogenesis imperfecta. J Am Dent Assoc. 2005; 136(5): 620–630. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2005.0233

14. Saxer UP, Mühlemann HR. [Motivation and education]. Schweiz Monatsschrift Zahnheilkd Rev Mens Suisse Odonto-Stomatol. 1975; 85(9): 905–919.

15. Quigley GA, Hein JW. Comparative cleansing efficiency of manual and power brushing. J Am Dent Assoc. 1962; 65(1): 26–29. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1962.0184

16. Lyne A, Parekh S, Patel N, Lafferty F, Brown C, Rodd H, et al. Patient-reported outcome measure for children and young people with amelogenesis imperfecta. Br Dent J. 2021. doi: 10.1038/s41415-021-3329-9

17. Ceyhan D, Kirzioglu Z, Emek T. A long-term clinical study on individuals with amelogenesis imperfecta. Niger J Clin Pract. 2019; 22(8): 1157. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_227_18

18. Pousette Lundgren G, Dahllöf G. Advances in clinical diagnosis and management of amelogenesis imperfecta in children and adolescents. J Dent. 2024; 147 : 105149. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105149

19. Appelstrand SB, Robertson A, Sabel N. Patient-reported outcome measures in individuals with amelogenesis imperfecta: a systematic review. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent off J Eur Acad Paediatr Dent. 2022; 23(6): 885–895. doi: 10.1007/s40368-022-00737-3

20. Pousette Lundgren G, Wickström A, Hasselblad T, Dahllöf G. Amelogenesis imperfecta and early restorative crown therapy: An interview study with adolescents and young adults on their experiences. Divaris K, editor. PLOS One. 2016; 11(6): e0156879.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156879

Labels
Maxillofacial surgery Orthodontics Dental medicine
Login
Forgotten password

Enter the email address that you registered with. We will send you instructions on how to set a new password.

Login

Don‘t have an account?  Create new account

#ADS_BOTTOM_SCRIPTS#