How patients can help us be even better doctors – educational leaflet “Before I go to the doctor”
Authors:
M. Světlák 1,2; V. Šnajdrová 3; K. Fialová 1
Authors‘ workplace:
Ústav lékařské psychologie a psychosomatiky, LF MU Brno
1; Úsek klinické psychologie, Klinika komplexní onkologické péče LF MU a MOÚ Brno
2; Interní oddělení, Nemocnice Blansko
3
Published in:
Klin Onkol 2023; 37(4): 307-313
Category:
Original Articles
Overview
Background: Medical psychology research shows that how a patient communicates appears to be the strongest predictor of physician behavior during a consultation and that patient’s activity also influences how much information a physician communicates to a patient about his or her illness and treatment. Thus, being a patient is a skill that needs to be developed to balance the responsibilities of doctors and patients in each of their encounters. There is a lack of clear recommendations and education in this area, and patients’ behaviour is instead governed by the etiquette of courtesy.
Purpose: The main aim of this article is to create a list of recommendations for patients and physicians to develop the skill of a competent patient in mutual communication and to include these recommendations into an educational leaflet with the aim to support the diagnostic and therapeutic process and personalized care.
Material and methods: Literature sources were selected unsystematically for the purpose of a narrative review, guided by the question: “What patient skills and competencies promote effective communication with the physician?” We adopted the snowball method, sometimes referred to as chain or reference selection, to generate the list.
Results: The results of the current narrative review demonstrate that the topic of patient communication competencies interests researchers and clinicians across medical disciplines. A summary of patient competencies was developed into an educational handout entitled “Before I go to the doctor”. The leaflet can be freely distributed in a printed form, as presented in the article, or patients can be referred to its electronic version (via QR code on the leaflet or on the website of the Department of Medical Psychology and Psychosomatics of the Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, in the educational materials section at https: //upp.med.muni.cz/zdroje/edu). The educational leaflet can be used as educational material in any healthcare facility.
Conclusion: Being a competent patient is an ideal state that we strive for from the position of patients and physicians in order to develop medicine more symmetrically, in partnership and with an optimal distribution of responsibility for health, illness and treatment. The information leaflet is one of the possible and fundamental interventions to develop the skill of competent communication on the part of the patient. It is the most commonly used communication channel in patient education. The current list of recommendations is not definitive and binding. However, it opens up the topic itself. It names the dimensions of doctor-patient communication and gives both parties the opportunity to consider what their relationship should be like, what is missing in this relationship, and what is important to both parties.
Keywords:
competent patient – communication skills – patient-centered care – responsibility in communication
Sources
1. Kolářová Z. O empatii, soucitu a lidskosti v dnešní medicíně. [online]. Dostupné z: https: //www.tribune.cz/komentare/o-empatii-soucitu-a-lidskosti-v-dnesni-medicine/.
2. Ayers S, de Visser R. Psychology for medicine & healthcare. London: Sage 2017.
3. Arnold CL, Coran JJ, Hagen MG. Revisiting patient communication training: an updated needs assessment and the AGENDA model. Patient Educ Couns 2012; 88 (3): 399–405. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2012.06.026.
4. Baile WF, Buckman R, Lenzi R et al. SPIKES-A six-step protocol for delivering bad news: application to the patient with cancer. Oncologist 2000; 5 (4): 302–311. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.5-4-302.
5. Talen MR, Muller-Held CF, Eshleman KG et al. Patients’ communication with doctors: a randomized control study of a brief patient communication intervention. Fam Syst Health 2011; 29 (3): 171–183. doi: 10.1037/a0024 399.
6. Harrington J, Noble LM, Newman SP. Improving patients’ communication with doctors: a systematic review of intervention studies. Patient Educ Couns 2004; 52 (1): 7–16. doi: 10.1016/s0738-3991 (03) 00017-x.
7. Söllner W, DeVries A, Steixner E et al. How successful are oncologists in identifying patient distress, perceived social support, and need for psychosocial counselling? Br J Cancer 2001; 84 (2): 179–185. doi: 10.1054/bjoc.2000. 1545.
8. Slezáčková A, Dvořáčková K, Kopecký O et al. Factors influencing the end-of-life decisionmaking process about care in hospitalized patients. Cas Lek Cesk 2021; 160 (5): 176–184.
9. Sochor M, Sláma O, Loučka M. Early integration of palliative care into standard oncology care – benefits, limitations, barriers and types of palliative care. Klin Onkol 2015; 28 (3): 171–176. doi: 10.14735/amko2015171.
10. Světláková L, Sláma O, Světlák M et al. Prevalence of anxiety and depression and their impact on the quality of life of cancer patients treated with palliative antineoplasic therapy – results of the PALINT trial. Klin Onkol 2019; 32 (3): 201–207. doi: 10.14735/amko2019 201.
11. Špaček L. Etiketa pro lékaře, zdravotníky a pomáhající profese. Praha: EEZY Publishing 2021.
12. Schofield W. Psychotherapy: the purchase of friendship. London: Routledge 1986.
13. Světlák M, Suchý A. Psychological support for cancer care professionals: contemporary theory and practice within the Czech Healthcare System. Klin Onkol 2011; 24 (4): 302–307.
14. Stewart M, Brown JB, Donner A et al. The impact of patient-centered care on outcomes. J Fam Pract 2000; 49 (9): 796–804.
15. van Osch M, van Dulmen S, van Vliet L et al. Specifying the effects of physician’s communication on patients’ outcomes: a randomised controlled trial. Patient Educ Couns 2017; 100 (8): 1482–1489. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.03.009.
16. Adam Z, Klimeš J, Boleloucký Z et al. Patient’s benefits from physician’s empathy and results of including of empathy development into medical training. Klin Onkol 2022; 35 (5): 358–371. doi: 10.48095/ccko2022358.
17. Světlák M, Daňhelová Š, Kóša B et al. Self-compassion in medical students: a pilot study of its association with professionalism pressure. BMC Med Educ 2021; 21 (1): 500. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02930-2.
18. Nine tips for patients. Few of us like being patients, but there are ways to take charge of the situation and make the best of it. Harv Health Lett 2004; 29 (9): 1–2.
19. Cegala DJ, Chisolm DJ, Nwomeh BC. Further examination of the impact of patient participation on physicians’ communication style. Patient Educ Couns 2012; 89 (1): 25–30. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2012.03.022.
20. Street RL, Gordon H, Haidet P. Physicians’ communication and perceptions of patients: is it how they look, how they talk, or is it just the doctor? Soc Sci Med 2007; 65 (3): 586–598. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.03.036.
21. Sidani S. Effects of patient-centered care on patient outcomes: an evaluation. Res Theory Nurs Pract 2008; 22 (1): 24–37.
22. Schmidt E, Schöpf AC, Farin E. What is competent communication behaviour of patients in physician consultations? Chronically-ill patients answer in focus groups. Psychol Health Med 2017; 22 (8): 987–1000. doi: 10.1080/13548506.2016.1248450.
23. Family Y, Arnold CL, Coran JJ et al. The impact of patient-centered care on outcomes. J Fam Pract 2000; 49 (9): 796–804.
24. Talen MR, Grampp K, Tucker A et al. What physicians want from their patients: identifying what makes good patient communication. Fam Syst Health 2008; 26 (1): 58–66. doi: 10.1037/1091-7527.26.1.58.
25. 11 things you should talk to your doctor about. It‘s easy to suggest that you talk to your doctor. It‘s much harder to know what to say. Harv Health Lett 2004; 29 (5): 1–2.
26. Siddaway AP, Wood AM, Hedges LV. How to do a systematic review: a best practice guide for conducting and reporting narrative reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-syntheses. Annu Rev Psychol 2019; 70: 747–770. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102803.
27. Given LM. Snowball sampling. In: The SAGE encyclopedia of qualitative research methods. SAGE Publications 2008: 816–817.
28. Tabak RG, Khoong EC, Chambers DA et al. Bridging research and practice: models for dissemination and implementation research. Am J Prev Med 2012; 43 (3): 337–350. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.05.024.
29. Farin E, Schmidt E, Gramm L. Patient communication competence: development of a German questionnaire and correlates of competent patient behavior. Patient Educ Couns 2014; 94 (3): 342–350. doi: 10.1016/ j.pec.2013.11.005.
30. Harrington J, Noble LM, Newman SP. Improving patients’ communication with doctors: a systematic review of intervention studies. Patient Educ Couns 2004; 52 (1): 7–16. doi: 10.1016/s0738-3991 (03) 00017-x.
31. Greenfield S, Kaplan S, Ware JE. Expanding patient involvement in care: effects on patient outcomes. Ann Intern Med 1985; 102 (4): 520–528. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-102-4-520.
32. Cegala DJ. Emerging trends and future directions in patient communication skills training. Health Commun 2006; 20 (2): 123–129. doi: 10.1207/s15327027hc2002_3.
33. Cegala DJ, Marinelli T, Post D. The effects of patient communication skills training on compliance. Arch Fam Med 2000; 9 (1): 57–64. doi: 10.1001/archfami.9.1.57.
34. Epstein R. Attending: medicine, mindfulness, and humanity. New York: Simon & Schuster 2016.
35. Frederikson LG, Bull PE. Evaluation of a patient education leaflet designed to improve communication in medical consultations. Patient Educ Couns 1995; 25 (1): 51–57. doi: 10.1016/0738-3991 (94) 00696-j.
36. Lekárová M, Barešová Z, Světlák M et al. eHealth in medicine and oncology – new horizons of clinical practice. Klin Onkol 2021; 34 (5): 366–373. doi: 10.48095/ ccko2021366.
37. Kennifer SL, Alexander SC, Pollak KI et al. Negative emotions in cancer care: do oncologists’ responses depend on severity and type of emotion? Patient Educ Couns 2009; 76 (1): 51–56. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.10.003.
38. October TW, Dizon ZB, Arnold RM et al. Characteristics of physician empathetic statements during pediatric intensive care conferences with family members: a qualitative study. JAMA Netw Open 2018; 1 (3): e180351. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.0351.
39. de Waal FBM, Preston SD. Mammalian empathy: behavioural manifestations and neural basis. Nat Rev Neurosci 2017; 18 (8): 498–509. doi: 10.1038/nrn.2017.72.
40. Little P, Dorward M, Warner G et al. Randomised controlled trial of effect of leaflets to empower patients in consultations in primary care. Br Med J 2004; 328 (7437): 441. doi: 10.1136/bmj.37999.716157.44.
Labels
Paediatric clinical oncology Surgery Clinical oncologyArticle was published in
Clinical Oncology
2023 Issue 4
Most read in this issue
- Enzalutamide and abiraterone in the treatment of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treated previously with chemotherapy
- Circulating free DNA and its potential in the diagnostics and therapy of malignant lymphoma
- Therapy of Castleman’s disease with siltuximab – case report and review of literature
- Pět P tuzemské onkologie – pochvala, podpora, polemika, pochybnosti, poklesky