-
Medical journals
- Career
Clinical approach to patients with aortic stenosis
Authors: K. Linhartová
Authors‘ workplace: Kardiochirurgické oddělení, FN Plzeň Kardiologie v sadech, s. r. o., Plzeň
Published in: Kardiol Rev Int Med 2015, 17(4): 322-324
Category: Cardiology Review
Overview
Aortic stenosis is the most frequently corrected valve disease affecting 2.5% of persons over 65 years. Aortic stenosis is always progressive, while the rate of progression varies. Aortic valve replacement is indicated in patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis or ejection fraction (< 50%). Patients with asymptomatic aortic stenosis who can profit from early surgery are selected by risk stratification. Surgical aortic valve replacement is standard in patients with low and medium risk. TAVI 5-year results are similar to surgery in high risk patients and better than conservative treatment in inoperable patients. The choice of TAVI vs. surgery is a team decision based on the overall risk and anatomical factors of aortic stenosis.
Keywords:
aortic stenosis – calcification – aortic valve replacement – TAVI – exercise test
Sources
1. Stewart BF, Siscovick D, Lind BK et al. Clinical factors associated with calcific aortic valve disease. Cardiovascular Health Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997; 29 : 630–634.
2. Linhartová K. Diagnostika aortální stenózy. Kardiol Rev Int Med 2013; 15 : 141–143.
3. Lee SP, Lee W, Lee JM et al. Assessment of diffuse myocardial fibrosis by using MR imaging in asymptomatic patients with aortic stenosis. Radiology 2015; 274 : 359–369. doi: 10.1148/ radiol.14141120.
4. Vahanian A, Alfieri O, Andreotti F et al. Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease (version 2012). Eur Heart J 2012; 33 : 2451–2496. doi: 10.1093/ eurheartj/ ehs109.
5. Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO et al. 2014 AHA/ ACC Guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2014; 129 : 2440–2492. doi: 10.1161/ CIR.0000000000000029.
6. Michelena HI, Desjardins VA, Avierinos JF et al. Natural history of asymptomatic patients with normally functioning or minimally dysfunctional bicuspid aortic valve in the community. Circulation 2008; 117 : 2776–2784. doi: 10.1161/ CIRCULATIONAHA.107.740878.
7. Rashedi N, Otto CM. Aortic stenosis: Changing disease concepts. J Cardiovasc Ultrasound 2015; 23 : 59–69. doi: 10.4250/ jcu.2015.23.2.59.
8. Linhartová K, Filipovský J, Cerbák R et al. Severe aortic stenosis and its association with hypertension: analysis of clinical and echocardiographic parameters. Blood Press 2007; 16 : 122–128.
9. Rossebø AB, Pedersen TR, Boman K. Intensive lipid lowering with simvastatin and ezetimibe in aortic stenosis. N Engl J Med 2008; 359 : 1343–1356. doi: 10.1056/ NEJMoa0804602.
10. Kang DH, Park SJ, Rim JH. Early surgery versus conventional treatment in asymptomatic very severe aortic stenosis. Circulation 2010; 121 : 1502–1509. doi: 10.1161/ CIRCULATIONAHA.109.909903.
11. Rosenhek R, Zilberszac R, Schemper M. Natural history of very severe aortic stenosis. Circulation 2010; 121 : 151–156. doi: 10.1161/ CIRCULATIONAHA.109.894170.
12. Clavel MA, Malouf J, Michelena HI et al. B-type natriuretic peptide clinical activation in aortic stenosis: impact on long-term survival. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014; 63 : 2016–2025. doi: 10.1016/ j.jacc.2014.02.581.
13. Mack MJ, Leon MB, Smith CR et al. 5-year outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement or surgical aortic valve replacement for high surgical risk patients with aortic stenosis (PARTNER 1): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2015; 385 : 2477–2484. doi: 10.1016/ S0140-6736(15)60308-7.
14. Kapadia SR, Leon MB, Makkar Rr et al. 5-year outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement compared with standard treatment for patients with inoperable aortic stenosis (PARTNER 1): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2015; 385 : 2485–2491. doi: 10.1016/ S0140-6736(15)60290-2.
15. Pawade TA, Newby D, Dweck M. Study investigating the effect of drugs used to treat osteoporosis on the progression of calcific aortic stenosis. (SALTIRE II). NCT02132026. Available from: https:/ / clinicaltrials.gov/ ct2/ show/ NCT02132026.
Labels
Paediatric cardiology Internal medicine Cardiac surgery Cardiology
Article was published inCardiology Review
2015 Issue 4-
All articles in this issue
- Myocarditis and inflammatory cardiomyopathy
- Giant cell myocarditis and cardiac sarcoidosis – update 2015
- Pericarditis
- Venous vascular diseases – an urgent issue in clinical medicine
- Diagnosis, classification and principles of management of cerebrovascular atherosclerotic disease from perspective of angiology
- Evolocumab – antibody against PCSK9 with a profound lipid-lowering effect
- Infectious endocarditis – diagnostics and guidelines
- Adults with congenital heart diseases
- Clinical approach to patients with aortic stenosis
- Indication for intervention and the most appropriate treatment of mitral regurgitation
-
Vztah a klinický význam chronického onemocnění ledvin u pacientů s poruchami srdečního rytmu a/ nebo s implantabilními elektrickými přístroji
Zkrácená komentovaná verze oficiálního stanoviska Evropské společnosti pro srdeční rytmus -
Jak léčit dyslipidemii u pacientů s renální insuficiencí
Výběr z doporučení KDIGO s klinickým komentářem - Prescribing antibiotic treatment in patients on renal replacement therapy
- Cardiology Review
- Journal archive
- Current issue
- Online only
- About the journal
Most read in this issue- Pericarditis
- Myocarditis and inflammatory cardiomyopathy
- Adults with congenital heart diseases
- Infectious endocarditis – diagnostics and guidelines
Login#ADS_BOTTOM_SCRIPTS#Forgotten passwordEnter the email address that you registered with. We will send you instructions on how to set a new password.
- Career