#PAGE_PARAMS# #ADS_HEAD_SCRIPTS# #MICRODATA#

SOCIAL (PRAGMATIC) COMMUNICATION DISORDER


Authors: Červenková Barbora 1,2
Authors‘ workplace: Ústav speciálněpedagogických studií, Pedagogická fakulta Univerzity Palackého v Olomouci 1;  Fakultní nemocnice Brno, Neonatologické oddělení 2
Published in: Listy klinické logopedie 2022; 6(2): 56-61
Category: Miscellaneous
doi: https://doi.org/10.36833/lkl.2022.018

Overview

Due to its complex nature, speech can be divided into four basic linguistic levels (phonetic-phonological, lexical-semantic, morphological-syntactic, and pragmatic). Within the linguistically oriented directions, we have recently seen an increased interest in the field of Pragmalinguistics. However, Clinical Speech Therapy publications devoted to the pragmatic language level and difficulties in the field of social pragmatic communication are still lacking. The diagnosis of Social (Pragmatic) Communication Disorder has recently been included in the DSM-V diagnostic manual of the American Psychiatric Society (APA). The diagnosis of Developmental Language Disorder, with difficulties mainly in pragmatic communication, is newly included in ICD-11 – the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems. In the meantime, we are currently waiting for the implementation of MKN-11 in the Czech healthcare system. This article considers the differences in the definition of this diagnosis within the DSM-V and ICD-11, the need for the emergence of new diagnostic tools and the possibility of conceptualising therapeutic procedures.

Keywords:

ICD-11 – DSM-V – Neurodevelopmental disorders – Social Pragmatic Communication Disorder – pragmatic language


Sources
  1. ADAMS, C., COKE, C., CRUTCHLEY, R., HESKET, A., DAVID, A. (2001). Assessment of Comprehension and Expression 6–11. NFER-Nelson, London.
  2. ADAMS, C., 2002. Practitioner review: the assessment of language pragmatics. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. [online]. 2002, 43(8), s. 973-987 [cit. 17. 5. 2022]. ISSN 0021-9630. DOI:10.1111/1469-7610.00226. Dostupné z: https://doi. org/10.1111/1469-7610.00226
  3. ADAMS, C. a J. T. LLOYD, 2005. Elicited and spontaneous communicative functions and stability of conversational measures with children who have pragmatic language impairments. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders [online]. 2005, 40(3), s. 333-347 [cit. 16. 5. 2022]. ISSN 1368-2822. DOI:10.1080/13682820400027768. Dostupné z: https://doi. org/10.1080/13682820400027768
  4. ADAMS, C., GAILE, J., LOCKTON, E. a J. FREED, 2011. TOPICCAL applications: assessment of children's conversation skills. Speech and Language Therapy in Practice, Spring, s. 7-9.
  5. ADAMS, C., GAILE, J., LOCKTON, E. a J. FREED, 2011. Targeted observation of pragmatics in children’s conversations (TOPICC): adapting a research tool into a clinical assessment profile. Speech and Language Therapy in Practice, 2(2011), s. 7-10.
  6. BISHOP, D. V. M. a C. ADAMS, 1989. Conversational characteristics of children with semantic-pragmatic disorder. II: What features lead to a judgement of inappropriacy? International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders [online]. 24(3), s. 241-263. [cit. 16. 5. 2022]. ISSN 1368-2822. DOI:10.3109/13682828909019890. Dostupné z: https://doi.org/10.3109/13682828909019890
  7. BISHOP, D. V. M. 2003. The children’s communication checklist (CCC-2): CCC-2 manual (2nd ed.). London: Harcourt Assessment.
  8. BISHOP, D. V. M. 2010. Which neurodevelopmental disorders get researched and why? PLoS ONE [online]. 5(11) s. e15112. [cit. 16. 5. 2022]. ISSN 1932-6203. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015112. Dostupné z: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0015112
  9. CARTER, J. A., LEES, J. A., MURIA, G. M., GONA, J., NEVILLE, B. G. R. a C. R. J. C. NEWTON, 2005. Issues in the development of cross-cultural assessments of speech and language for children. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders [online]. 40(4), s. 385-401. [cit. 17. 5. 2022]. ISSN 1368-2822. DOI:10.1080/13682820500057301. Dostupné z: https://doi. org/10.1080/13682820500057301
  10. CHIAT, S., a P. ROY, 2008. Early phonological and sociocognitive skills as predictors of later language and social communication outcomes. Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines, [online]. 49(6), s. 635-645 [cit. 16. 5. 2022]. ISSN 0021-9630. DOI:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2008.01881.x. Dostupné z: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2008.01881.x Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-5-TR™). 2022. American Psychiatric Association, 1120 p. ISBN 978-0-89042-576-3. Dostupné z: APA - Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Fifth Edition Text Revision DSM-5-TR (appi.org)
  11. DURKIN, K., a G. CONTI-RAMSDEN, 2007. Language, social behavior, and the quality of friendships in adolescents with and without a history of specific language impairment. Child Development [online]. 78(5), s. 1441-1457. [cit. 16. 5. 2022]. ISSN 0009-3920. Dostupné z: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01076.x
  12. HAWKINS, E., GATHERCOLE, S., ASTLE, D. a J. HOLMES, 2016. Language problems and ADHD symptoms: How specific are the links? Brain Sciences [online]. 6(4) [cit. 16. 5. 2022]. ISSN 2076-3425. DOI:10.3390/brainsci6040050. Dostupné z: https://doi. org/10.3390/brainsci6040050
  13. HOROWITZ, L., JANSSON, L., LJUNGBERG, T. a M. HEDENBRO, 2006. Interaction before conflict and conflict resolution in pre-school boys with language impairment. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders [online]. 41(4), s. 441-466. [cit. 16. 5. 2022]. ISSN: 1460-6984. DOI:10.1080/13682820500292551. Dostupné z: https://doi.org/10.1080/13682820500292551
  14. HUERTA, M., BISHOP, S. L., DUNCAN, A., HUS, V. a C. LORD, 2012. Application of DSM-5 criteria for autism spectrum disorder to three samples of children with DSM-IV diagnoses of pervasive developmental disorders. [online]. The American journal of psychiatry, 169(10), s. 1056–1064. [cit. 16. 5. 2022]. ISSN 0002-953X. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2012.12020276. Dostupné z: https://doi.org/10.1176/ appi.ajp.2012.12020276.
  15. JOHN, A., ROWE, M. L., a C. B. MERVIS, 2009. Referential communication skills of children with Williams syndrome: Understanding when messages are not adequate. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities [online]. 114(2), s. 85-99. [cit. 16. 5. 2022]. ISSN 1944-7558. DOI:10.1352/2009.114.85-99. Dostupné z: https://doi.org/10.1352/2009.114.85-99
  16. LECHTA, V. 1990. Logopedické repetitórium: teoretické východiská súčasnej logopédie, moderné prístupy k logopedickej starostlivosti o osoby s narušenou komunikačnou schopnosťou. Bratislava: Slov. pedagog. nakl., 278 s. ISBN 80-080-0447- 9.
  17. LEEKAM, S., TANDOS, J., MCCONACHIE, H., MEINS, E., PARKINSON, K., WRIGHT, C., TURNER, M., ARNOTT, B., VITTORINI, L. a A. LE COUTEUR, 2007. Repetitive behaviours in typically developing 2-year-olds. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 48(11), s. 1131–1138. DOI:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007. 01778.x. Dostupné z: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01778.x
  18. EONARD, M. A., MILICH, R. a E. P. LORCH, 2011. The role of pragmatic language use in mediating the relation between hyperactivity and inattention and social skills problems. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research [online]. 54(2), s. 567-579 [cit. 16. 5. 2022]. ISSN 1092-4388. DOI:10.1044/1092-4388(2010/10-0058). Dostupné z: https://doi. org/10.1044/1092-4388(2010/10-0058)
  19. LORD, C., RUTTER, M., DILAVORE, P. a S. RISI, 2001. Autism diagnostic observation schedule (ADOS) manual. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.
  20. LUYSTER, R., GOTHAM, K., GUTHRIE, W., COFFING, M., PETRAK, R., PIERCE, K., BISHOP, S., ESLER, A., HUS. V., OTI, R., RICHLER, J., RISI, S. a C. LORD, 2009. The autism diagnostic observation schedule-toddler module: a new module of a standardized diagnostic measure for autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders [online]. 39(9), s. 1305-1320. [cit. 17. 5. 2022]. ISSN 0162-3257. DOI:10.1007/s10803-009-0746-z. Dostupné z: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-009-0746-z
  21. MANDY, W., CHARMAN, T., GILMOUR, J. a D. SKUSE, 2011. Toward specifying pervasive developmental disorder-not otherwise specified. Autism Research [online]. 4(2), s. 121-131 [cit. 16. 5. 2022]. ISSN 1939-3792. DOI:10.1002/aur.178 Dostupné z: https://doi. org/10.1002/aur.178
  22. MARTON, K., ABRAMOFF, B., a S. ROSENZWEIG, 2005. Social cognition and language in children with specific language impairment (SLI). Journal of Communication Disorders [online]. 38(2), s. 143-162 [cit. 16. 5. 2022]. ISSN 0021-9924. DOI: 10.1016/j. jcomdis.2004.06.003. Dostupné z: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2004.06.003.
  23. McPARTLAND, J. C., REICHOW, B., a F. R. VOLKMAR, 2012. Sensitivity and Specificity of the proposed DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for autism spectrum disorder. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry [online]. 51(4), s. 368-383. [cit. 15. 5. 2022]. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaac.2012.01.007 Dostupné z: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2012.01.007
  24. MUNDY, P., DELGADO, C., BLOCK, J., VENEZIA, M., HOGAN, A. a SEIBERT, J., 2003. A manual for the early social communication scales (ESCS). Davis: MIND Institute, University of California at Davis. Dostupné z: www.researchgate.net/ publication/228984460_Early_social_communication_scales_ESCS
  25. NORBURY, C. F., a A. SPARKS, 2013. Difference or disorder? Cultural issues in understanding neurodevelopmental disorders. Developmental Psychology [online]. 49(1), s. 45-58. [cit. 16. 5. 2022]. ISSN 1939-0599. DOI:10.1037/a0027446 Dostupné z: https://doi. org/10.1037/a0027446
  26. NORBURY, C. F., 2014. Practitioner review: Social (pragmatic) communication disorder conceptualization, evidence and clinical implications. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry [online]. 55(3), s. 204-216 [cit. 15. 5. 2022]. DOI:10.1111/jcpp.12154 ISSN 0021-9630. Dostupné z: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12154
  27. PHELPS-TERASAKI, D., a T. PHELPS-GUNN, 2007. Test of pragmatic language. 2nd ed. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed. RAPIN, I., a D. ALLEN, 1983. Developmental language disorders: Nosological considerations. In U. Kirk (ed.) Neuropsychology of language, reading and spelling. New York: Academic Press. s. 155-183. ISBN 978-0-12-409680-6. Dostupné z: https://doi.org/10.1016/ B978-0-12-409680-6.X5001-X
  28. REISINGER, L. M., CORNISH, K., a E. FOMBONNE, 2011. Diagnostic differentiation of autism spectrum disorders and pragmatic language impairment. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders [online]. 41(12), s. 1694-1704 [cit. 17. 5. 2022]. ISSN 0162-3257. DOI:10.1007/s10803-011-1196-y. Dostupné z: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-011-1196-y
  29. SCHOEN, E. a R. PAUL, 2009. Assessing pragmatic language skills in high-functioning autism spectrum disorders. Poster presented at the Society for Research in Child Development, Denver, CO.
  30. STAIKOVA, E., GOMES, H., TARTTER, V., MCCABE, A. a J. M. HALPERIN, 2013. Pragmatic deficits and social impairment in children with ADHD. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, [online]. 54(12), s. 1275-1283. [cit. 16. 5. 2022]. DOI:10.1111/jcpp.12082. ISSN 0021-9630. Dostupné z: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12082
  31. VOLDEN, J., COOLICAN, J., GARON, N., WHITE, J. a S. BRYSON, 2009. Brief report: Pragmatic language in autism spectrum disorder: Relationships to measures of ability and disability. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders [online]. 39(2), s. 388-393 [cit. 16. 5. 2022]. ISSN 0162-3257. DOI:10.1007/s10803-008-0618-y. Dostupné z: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-008-0618-y.
  32. WETHERBY, A., a B. PRIZANT, 1993. Communication and symbolic behavior scales. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Company.
  33. WHITEHOUSE, A. J., WATT, H. J., LINE, E. A. a D. V. M. BISHOP, 2009. Adult psychosocial outcomes of children with specific language impairment, pragmatic language impairment and autism. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, [online]. 44(4) s. 511-528. [cit. 15. 5. 2022]. DOI: 10.1080/13682820802708098. ISSN 1368-2822. Dostupné z: https://doi. org/10.1080/13682820802708098
  34. WIIG, E. H. a W. SECORD. 1989. Test of language competence. The Test of Pragmatic Language (TOPL-2) identifies individuals with pragmatic language deficits, determines strengths and weaknesses.
  35. World Health Organisation, 2022. International Classification of Diseases. 11th Revision. The global standard for diagnostic health information. Version: 02/2022. Chapter 06 Mental, behavioural or neurodevelopmental disorders. Geneva: WHO.
Labels
Clinical speech therapy General practitioner for children and adolescents

Article was published in

Listy klinické logopedie

Issue 2

2022 Issue 2

Most read in this issue
Login
Forgotten password

Enter the email address that you registered with. We will send you instructions on how to set a new password.

Login

Don‘t have an account?  Create new account

#ADS_BOTTOM_SCRIPTS#