Contemporary diagnostic determination of D-dimer plasma concentration
Authors:
V. Mašková 1,2; L. Landová 1,2; M. Bohoněk 1,2
Authors‘ workplace:
Oddělení hematologie a krevní transfuze, Ústav laboratorní medicíny, hematologie a transfuziologie FBMI ČVUT a ÚVN, ÚVN – VFN Praha
1; Faktulta biomedicínského inženýrství ČVUT Praha
2
Published in:
Transfuze Hematol. dnes,32, 2026, No. 3, p. 207-211.
Category:
Original Papers
doi:
https://doi.org/10.48095/cctahd202616
Overview
There is currently no unified consensus regarding the units used for reporting laboratory results of D-dimers as a specific fibrin (ogen) degradation product (FDP). Within the professional community, there is ongoing discussion about which units should be used to report this marker of fibrin degradation, as well as which diagnostic assay should be applied, since different manufacturers use different measurement units. These include mg/L FEU and mg/L D-Dimer (DDU), each linked to different calibrators. We conducted a pilot comparative study of plasma D-dimer concentrations expressed in two commonly used units: mg/L FEU (fibrinogen equivalent units) and mg/L D-Dimer (DDU). The results were obtained using immunoturbidimetric measurement with two different diagnostic assays – one calibrated in mg/L D-Dimer and the other in mg/L FEU. Both D-dimer kits were provided by the same manufacturer and were based on the latex-enhanced immunoassay (LIA) principle using a highly sensitive method certified for the clinical exclusion of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). A total of 65 plasma samples collected from adult patients (without stratification by sex, age, or diagnosis) were included in the study. D-dimer concentrations measured by both diagnostic assays were compared. The assay calibrated in mg/L D-Dimer was used as the primary routine method. The same plasma samples were subsequently analysed using the second diagnostic assay calibrated in mg/L FEU. The mean measured concentration was 0.524 mg/L D-Dimer (SD = 1.066) and 1.598 mg/L FEU (SD = 3.315). Statistical analysis using non-parametric Passing-Bablok regression demonstrated that the relationship between the two units is not simply twofold, as has sometimes been generally reported in the literature and assumed in clinical practice, but may in fact be up to threefold. Therefore, results obtained using different assays – i.e., without traceability to common calibrators, cannot be directly numerically compared. It is recommended to consistently use a single validated method with a manufacturer defined cut-off value.
Keywords:
Pulmonary embolism – D-dimers – disseminated intravascular coagulopathy – deep venous thrombosis – FEU (fibrinogen equivalent units) – fibrinolysis and fibrin degradation products – LIA (Latex Imuno Assay) – DDim (units: mg/l DDU)
Sources
1. Hirmerová J, Karetová D, Malý R, Musil D, Roztočil K. Doporučený postup české angiologické společnosti ČLS JEP, Akutní žilní trombóza 2014: Současný stav prevence, diagnostiky a léčby. [online]. Dostupné z: DP_CAS_akutni_zilni_tromboza_2020.pdf.
2. Šigutová P, Fátorová I, Hrachovinová I, Juráňová J, Matýšková M, Mikulenková D, Vytisková S. Doporučení Laboratorní sekce ČHS ČLS JEP 2021: Preanalytika v hematologické laboratoři. [online]. Dostupné z: https: //labsekce.hematology.cz/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Doporuceni_LS_CHS_CLS_JEP-preanalytika_v_hematologicke_laboratori_v01.pdf.
3. Příbalový leták soupravy Hemosil® D-dimer HS, Instrumentation Laboratory, REF 0020007700 (v aktuální verzi).
4. Příbalový leták soupravy Hemosil® D-dimer HS 500, Instrumentation Laboratory, REF 0020500100 (v aktuální verzi).
5. Longstaff C, Adcock D, Olson JD, et al. Harmonisation of D-dimer – a call for action. Thromb Res. 2016; 137 : 219–220.
6. Olson JD, Cunningham MT, Higgins RA, Eby CS, Brandt JT. D-dimer simple test, tough problems. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2013; 137 (8): 1030–1038.
7. Riley RS, Gilbert AR, Dalton JB, Pai S, Pherson RA. Widely used types and clinical applications of D-dimer assay. Lab Med. 2016; 47 (2): 90–102. DOI: 10.1093/labmed/lmw001.
8. Karetová D. Kapitoly z kardiologie, In: Diagnostika a léčba hluboké žilní trombózy v roce 2014. Medical Tribune. 2014; 6 : 2–7. [online]. Dostupné z: https: //www.tribune.cz/archiv/diagnostika-a-lecba-hluboke-zilni-trombozy-v-roce-2014/
9. Prochaska J H, Frank B, Nagler M. Age-related diagnostic value of D-dimer testing and the role of inflammation in patients with suspected deep vein thrombosis. Scient Rep. 2017; (7). DOI: 10,1038/ /s41598-017-04843-x.
10. Lim W, Le Gal G, Bates SM, et al. American Society of Hematology 2018 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: diagnosis of venous thromboembolism. Blood Adv. 2018; 2 (22): 3226–3256.
11. Guiu XJ, Villegas AR, Rico CM, Coll RV. Role of an age-adjusted D-dimer cutoff level in the diagnosis algorithm of lower limb deep venous thrombosis in outpatients. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymph Dis. 2020; 8 (5): 734–740.
12. Doporučení Laboratorní sekce ČHS ČLS JEP. Dostupné z: http: //www.hematology.cz/doporuceni/laboratorni_sekce/files/referencni_meze/Doporuceni_LS_CHS_CLS_JEP-Referencni_meze-koagulace_v7.pdf.
13. Dyr JE. Co stanovují testy na D-dimer? Sborník příspěvků ke konferenci XI. Česko–slovenská konference laboratorní hematologie: Hradec Králové 2006; s.28–29. ISBN 80-86780-29-5.
14. The International System of Units (SI). Dostupné z: www.bipm.org/en/measurement-units.
15. CLSI H59-A, Quantitative D-dimer for the Exclusion of Venous Thromboembolic Disease; Approved Guideline.
Labels
Haematology Internal medicine Clinical oncologyArticle was published in
Transfusion and Haematology Today
2026 Issue 3
Most read in this issue
- Targeted treatment approaches for mantle cell lymphoma
- Multiple myeloma – from pathogenesis to modern therapy
- Emerging therapies for relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma
- Evaluation of morphological changes in platelets during storage of platelet concentrates