Přístupy ke sledování nákupů zdravotnických přístrojů

Czech version

Authors: Gleb Donin; Silvie Jeřábková; Peter Kneppo
Authors‘ workplace: Česká republika ; Fakulta biomedicinského inženýrství, České vysoké učení technické v Praze, Kladno
Published in: Lékař a technika - Clinician and Technology No. 1, 2015, 45, 27-31
Category: Original research

Overview

This article presents the approaches used for tracking purchases of medical equipment in the Czech Republic. Developed tracking system allows monitoring and evaluation of the procurement effectiveness and provides objective information to all parties involved in planning of medical equipment acquisition. The data collection process was designed and tested. Reports were designed and created based on multi-criteria comparisons within a complex data model. This model is based on formalization of procurement information and is designed to formulate hypotheses about the procurement effectiveness. Multi-criteria approach is based on the evaluation of medical devices purchases based on a set of criteria specified by the user. These criteria include the terms and conditions of purchase, the price of medical equipment and technical parameters. Designed system allows users to compare the purchase orders, identify their weaknesses and use this information to plan further acquisitions of medical equipment.

Keywords:
medical equipment, procurement tracking, data reporting, data modelling

Sources

[1] Nejvyšší kontrolní úřad (2013) Peněžní prostředky určené na rozvoj a obnovu materiálně-technické základny fakultních nemocnic. Věstník Nejvyššího Kontrolního úřadu 2:163–172.

[2] Rosina J., Rogalewicz V., Ivlev I. et al. (2014) Health Technology Assessment for medical devices. Lekar a technika – Clinician and Technol 44(3):23–36.

[3] Pauly M. V., Burns L. R. (2008) Price transparency for medical devices. Health Aff 27:1544–53. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.27.6.1544.

[4] Robinson J. C., Bridy A. (2009) Confidentiality and transparency for medical device prices : market dynamics and policy. http://bcht.berkeley.edu/docs/Device-Prices-Transparency-Report.pdf.

[5] Hahn R. W., Klovers K. B., Singer H. J. (2008) The need for greater price transparency in the medical device industry: an economic analysis. Health Aff. 27:1554–9. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.27.6.1554.

[6] Ruocco G. (2010) Two Italian Health authority databanks in the field of medical devices. In: First WHO Global Forum on Medical Devices. http://www.who.int/medical_devices/poster_a20.pdf.

[7] ECRI Institute SELECTplus Technology advisory service at https://www.ecri.org/components/SELECTplus/Pages/default.aspx.

[8] ECRI Institute PriceGuide Advisory Membership Service at https://www.ecri.org/Products/Pages/priceguide.aspx.

[9] Donin G., Kneppo P. (2014) Medical device procurement tracking system: concept and methods. IFMBE Proc. vol. 45, 6th Eur. Conf. Int. Fed. Med. Biol. Eng., Dubrovnik, Croatia, 2014, pp 629–632. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-11128-5_157.

[10] Příkaz ministra č. 25/2014: Rezortní interní protikorupční program Ministerstva zdravotnictví České republiky.

[11] Ivlev I., Kneppo P., Bartak M. (2014) Multicriteria decision analysis: a multifaceted approach to medical equipment management. Technol Econ Dev Econ 20:576–589. DOI: 10.3846/20294913.2014.943333.

[12] Sorenson C., Kanavos P. (2011) Medical technology procurement in Europe: A cross-country comparison of current practice and policy. Health Policy 100:43–50. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.08.001.

Labels

Biomedicine

EXPERIMENTAL MODAL ANALYSIS OF ULTRASONIC SURGICAL WAVEGUIDES USING EFFECT OF INVERSE MAGNETOSTRICTION

Preliminary testing of flexible electrodes for biosignal measurement: abrasion resistance

Utility of QRS isointegral maps in Left ventricular hypertrophy

Non-destructive testing of artificial joints with defects by eddy current method

Article was published in

The Clinician and Technology Journal

2015 Issue 1