Hernias robotically? State of the art

Czech version

Authors: L. Martínek
Authors‘ workplace: Chirurgická klinika LF OU a FN Ostrava
Published in: Rozhl. Chir., 2026, roč. 105, č. 7, s. 324-327.
Category: Review
doi: https://doi.org/10.48095/ccrvch2026324

Overview

The robotic approach has the potential to expand the advantages of minimally invasive surgery due to improved visualization, more sophisticated instruments, precise dissection, and better ergonomics. However, its benefits are not universal. For inguinal hernias, available data do not demonstrate a significant advantage over laparoscopy, particularly given the higher costs and often longer operative times. Conversely, for ventral hernias –⁠ especially large and complex defects –⁠ robotics enables advanced reconstructive techniques that are difficult to perform laparoscopically, shortens hospital stays, and reduces the incidence of complications. Indications for the robotic approach in hernia surgery are selective; study results are limited by the heterogeneity of the cohorts, short follow-up periods, and a lack of robust data. Cost-effectiveness remains debatable in our setting and depends primarily on the type of hernia. Moving forward, the creation of robust databases and the standardization of indications are key to a more accurate assessment of the true benefits of robotic surgery.

Keywords:

inguinal hernia – robotic surgery – Minimally invasive surgery – ventral hernia – laparoscopic surgery

Sources

1. Huang EY, Chung D, Sandler BJ et al. The future of robotics in the treatment of abdominal wall hernias: a narrative review. Int J Abdom Wall and Hernia Surg 2023; 6 (2): 81–91. doi: 10.4103/ijawhs.IJAWHS_18_23.

2. Sheetz KH, Claflin J, Dimick JB. Trends in the adoption of robotic surgery for common surgical procedures. JAMA Netw Open 2020; 3 (1): e1918911. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen. 2019.18911.

3. Bonner SN, Thumma JR, Dimick JB et al. Trends in use of robotic surgery for privately insured patients and medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6 (5): e2315052. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen. 2023.15052.

4. Vitiello A, Abu Abeid A, Peltrini R, et al. Minimally Invasive Repair of Recurrent Inguinal Hernia: Multi-InstitutionalRetrospective Comparison of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2023; 33 (1): 69–73. doi: 10.1089/lap.2022.0209.

5. de’Angelis N, Schena CA, Moszkowicz D et al. Robotic surgery for inguinal and ventral hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 2024; 38 (1): 24–46. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10545-5.

6. LeBlanc KA, Booth W. Laparoscopic repair of incisional abdominal hernias using expanded polytetrafluoroethylene: preliminary findings. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1993; 3 (1): 39–41.

7. Sauerland S, Walgenbach M, Habermalz B et al. Laparoscopic versus open surgical techniques for ventral or incisional hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011; 3: CD007781. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007781.pub2.

8. Colavita PD, Tsirline VB, Belyansky I et al. Prospective, long-term comparison of quality of life in laparoscopic versus open ventral hernia repair. Ann Surg 2012; 256 (5): 714–723. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182734130.

9. Yang GP. From intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair to preperitoneal onlay mesh repair. Asian J Endosc Surg 2017; 10 (2): 119–127. doi: 10.1111/ases.12388.

10. Love MW, Warren JA, Davis S et al. Computed tomography imaging in ventral hernia repair: can we predict the need for myofascial release? Hernia 2021; 25 (2): 471–477. doi: 10.1007/s10029-020-02181-y.

11. Makhecha K, Madduri S, Anderson ARet al. Robotic retromuscular hernia repair optimizes short-term outcomes in higher risk patients. Surg Endosc 2025; 39 (5): 2828–2835. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11630-7.

12. Peñafiel JA, Valladares G, Cyntia Lima A et al. Robotic assisted versus laparoscopic incisional hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hernia 2024; 28 (2): 321–332. doi: 10.1007/s10029-023-02881-1.

13. Sabbatini F, La Regina D, Murgante Testa Net al. Hospital costs of robotic-assisted and open treatment of large ventral hernias. Sci Rep 2024; 14 (1): 11523. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-62550-w.

14. Warren JA, Blackhurst D, Ewing JAet al. Open versus robotic retromuscular ventral hernia repair: outcomes of the ORREO prospective randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 2024; 38 (12): 7466–7474. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11202-1.

15. Dauser B, Hartig N, Vedadinejad Met al. Robotic-assisted repair of complex ventral hernia: can it pay off? J Robot Surg 2021; 15 (1): 45–52. doi: 10.1007/s11701-020-01078-3.

16. Dixit R, Prajapati OP, Krishna A et al. Patient-reported outcomes of laparoscopic versus robotic primary ventral and incisional hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hernia 2023; 27 (2): 245–257. doi: 10.1007/s10029-022-02733-4.

17. Peñafiel JA, Valladares G, Cyntia Lima Aet al. Robotic assisted versus laparoscopic incisional hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hernia 2024; 28 (2): 321–332. doi: 10.1007/s10029-023-02881-1. Erratum in: Hernia 2024; 28 (3): 963. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03071-3.

18. Anoldo P, Manigrasso M, D‘Amore A et al. Abdominal wall hernias –⁠ state of the art of laparoscopic versus robotic surgery. J Pers Med 2024; 14 (1): 100. doi: 10.3390/jpm14010100.

19. Singh A, Toh WH, Elzahed N et al. Laparoscopic versus robotic ventral hernia repair with intraperitoneal mesh: a systematic review and meta--analysis comparing the perioperative outcomes randomised controlled trials. J Abdom Wall Surg 2025; 3 : 13809. doi: 10.3389/jaws.2024.13809.

20. Lima DL, Nogueira R, Ma J et al. A comparison between robotic--assisted and open approaches for large ventral hernia repair –⁠ a multicenter analysis of 30 days outcomes using the ACHQC database. Surg Endosc 2024; 38 (12): 7538–7543. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11249-0.

21. Lima DL, da Silveira CA, de Oliveira CN et al. Open versus robotic transversus abdominis release for ventral hernia repair: an updated systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression. Surg Endosc 2024; 38 (12): 7083–7092. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11382-w.

22. Tran E, Sun J, Gundara J. Systematic review of robotic ventral hernia repair with meta-analysis. ANZ J Surg 2024; 94 (1–2): 37–46. doi: 10.1111/ans.18822.

23. Capoccia Giovannini S, Vierstraete M, Frascio M et al. Systematic review, and meta--analysis on robotic assisted ventral hernia repair: the ROVER review. Hernia 2025; 29 (1): 95. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03274-2.

24. Fry BT, Kappelman AL, Sinamo JK et al. Long-term patient reported outcomes after robotic, laparoscopic, and open ventral hernia repair. Surg Endosc 2025; 39 (1): 504–512. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11326-4.