Mesenteric Ischemia – Late Diagnosis or Managed Disease?
Authors:
J. Radoňak; L. Lakyová; T. Toporcer; J. Bober
Authors‘ workplace:
L. Pasteura, Košice, Slovenská republika
; I. chirurgická klinika, Lekárska fakulta Univerzity Pavla Jozefa Šafárika, Košice, Fakultná nemocnica
Published in:
Rozhl. Chir., 2010, roč. 89, č. 4, s. 242-246.
Category:
Monothematic special - Original
Overview
Aim:
Diagnosis and therapy of mesenteric ischaemia as the cause of an acute abdomen is a serious problem because of its 60–80% mortality.
The study presents experience with diagnosis and therapy of this disease and it compares its results with those in the literature.
Material and results:
Throughout the years 2000–2009, there were 39 patients surgically treated with mesenteric ischaemia (17 men, 21 women, the average age 73 Ī 9.43). 38.46% of patients underwent resection of small and large bowel, in 33.3% only a part of small intestinum was resected, and in two cases (5.13%), the resection was combined with the embolectomy of artery mesenteric superior. In 23.1% of patients, only an explorative laparatomy was performed, because of an extended affection. Four patients were reoperated (dehiscence of anastomosis, perforation of small bowel, dehiscence of the wound, enterocutaneous fistula). 23% of patients needed ventilation because of postoperative complications such as respiratory insufficiency, sepsis and heart failure. There was 53,8 % mortality. The abdominal pain (79%), vomitus (61.5%) and subileus (35.9%) predominated in the clinical picture. Leucocyts were elevated in 58.97% of patients. X ray examination showed non specific findings, and ultrasonography has proven to be successful in 42.3% of cases.
Conclusion:
Mortality of patients is significantly increased by low success rate of the depictive methods, non-specific clinical picture, co-morbidity in elderly patients and by late arrival to hospital.
Key words:
mesenteric ischemia – ultrasonography – laboratory screening – bowel necrosis – bowel resection – mortality
Sources
1. Kassahun, W. T., Schulz, T., Richter, O., Hauss, J. Unchanged high mortality rates from acute occlusive intestinal ischemia: six year review. Langenbecks Arch. Surg., 2008; 393: 163–171.
2. Debus, E. S., Diener, H., Larena-Avellaneda, A. Acute intestinal ischemia. Chirurg., 2009; 80: 375–385.
3. Cho, J. S., Carr, J. A., Jacobsen, G., Shepard, A. D., Nypaver, T. J., Reddy, D. J. Long-term outcome after mesenteric artery reconstruction: a 37-year experience. J. Vasc. Surg., 2002; 35: 453–460.
4. Schneider, T. A., Longo, W. E., Ure, T., Vernava Mesenteric ischemia: acute arterial syndromes. Dis. Colon Rectum, 1994; 37: 1163–1174.
5. Stamatakos, M., Stefanaki, C., Mastrokalos, D., Arampatzi, H., Safioleas, P., et al. Mesenteric ischemia: still a deadly puzzle for the medical community. Tohoku J. Exp. Med., 2008; 216: 197–204.
6. Kougias, P., Lau, D., El Sayed, H. F., Zhou, W., Huynh, T. T., Lin, P. H. Determinants of mortality and treatment outcome following surgical interventions for acute mesenteric ischemia. J. Vasc. Surg., 2007; 46: 467–474.
7. Huang, H. H., Chang, Y. C., Yen, D. H., Kao, W. F., Chen, J. D., Wang, L. M., Huang, C. I., Lee, C. H. Clinical factors and outcomes in patients with acute mesenteric ischemia in the emergency department. J. Chin. Med. Assoc., 2005; 68: 299–306.
8. Luther, B., Moussazadeh, K., Müller, B. T., Franke, C., Harms, J. M., Ernst, S., Sandmann, W. The acute mesenteric ischemia – not understood or incurable? Zentralbl. Chir., 2002; 127: 674–684.
9. Safioleas, M. C., Moulakakis, K. G., Papavassiliou, V. G., Kontzoglou, K., Kostakis, A. Acute mesenteric ischaemia, a highly lethal disease with a devastating outcome. Vasa, 2006; 35: 106–111.
10. Eltarawy, I. G., Etman, Y. M., Zenati, M., Simmons, R. L., Rosengart, M. R. Acute mesenteric ischemia: the importance of early surgical consultation. Am. Surg., 2009; 75: 212–219.
11. Demirpolat, G., Oran, I., Tamsel, S., Parildar, M., Memis, A. Acute mesenteric ischemia: endovascular therapy. Abdominal imaging, 2007; 32: 299–303.
12. Landis, M. S., Rajan, D. K., Simons, M. E., Hayeems, E. B., Kachura, J. R., Sniderman, K. W. Percutaneous management of chronic mesenteric ischaemia: outcomes after intervention. J. Vasc. Intervent. Adiol., 2005; 16: 1319–1325.
13. Seshadri, P. A., Poulin, E. C., Mamazza, J., Schlachta, C. M. Simplified laparoscopic approach to second-look laparotomy: a review. Surg. Laparosc. Endosc. Percutan. Tech., 1999; 9: 286–289.
14. Kaminsky, O., Yampolski, I., Aranovich, D., Gnessin, E., Greif, F. Does a second look operation improve survival in patients with peritonitis due to acute mesenteric ischemia? A five-year retrospective experience. World J. Surg., 2005; 29: 645–648.
15. Park, W. M., Gloviczki, P., Cherry, K. J., Hallett, J. W., Bower, T. C., Panneton, J. M., et al. Contemporary management of acute mesenteric ischemia: Factors associated with survival. J. Vasc. Surg., 2002; 35: 445–452.
16. Yasuhara, H. Acute Mesenteric Ischemia: The Challenge of Gastroenterology. Surg. Today, 2005; 35: 185–195.
17. Sreenarasimhaiah, J. Diagnosis and management of intestinal ischamemic disorders. B.M.J., 2003; 326 : 1372–1376.
18. Altinyollar, H., Boyabatli, M., Berberoglu, U. D-dimer as a marker for early diagnosis of acute mesenteric ischemia. Thromb. Res., 2006; 117: 463–467.
19. Kurt, Y., Akin, M. L., Demirbas, S., Uluutku A. H., Gulderen, M., Avsar, K., Celenk, T. D-dimer in early diagnosis of acute mesenteric ischaemia secondary to arterial occlusion in rats. Eur. Surg. Res., 2005; 37: 216–219.
20. Vokurka, J., Olejnik, J., Jedlicka, V., Vesely, M., Ciernik, J., Paseka, T. Acute mesenteric ischemia, 2008 ; 85: 1349–1352.
21. Ha, H. K., Rha, S. E., Kim, A. Y., Auh, Y. H. CT and MR diagnoses of intestinal ischemia. Semin. Ultrasound CT MR, 2000; 21: 40–55.
22. Kurland, B., Brandt, L. J., Delaney, H. M. Diagnostic tests for intestinal ischemia. Surg. Clin. North Am., 1992; 72: 85–105.
23. Galandiuk, S., Fazio, V. W., Petras, R. E. Fluorescein endoscopy: a technique for noninvasive assessment of intestinal ischemia. Dis. Colon Rectum, 1988; 31: 848–853.
24. Ballard, J. L., Stone, W. M., Hallett, J. W., Pairolero, P. C., Cherry, K. J. A critical analysis of adjuvant techniques used to assess bowel viability in acute mesenteric ischemia. Am. Surg., 1993; 59: 309–311.
25. Zwolak, R. M. Can duplex ultrasound replace arteriography in screening for mesenteric ischemia? Semin. Vasc. Surg., 1999; 12: 252–260.
26. Kiss, J., Naum, A., Kudomi, N., Knuuti, J., Iozzo, P., Savunen, T., Nuutila, P. Non-invasive diagnosis of acute mesenteric ischaemia using PET. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging, 2009; 36: 1338–1345.
27. Gunerhan, Y., Koksal, N., Kayahan, M., Eryavuz, Y., Sekban, H. Diagnostic value of plasminogen activity level in acute mesenteric ischemia. World J. Gastroenterol., 2008; 14: 2540–2543.
28. Gearhart, S. L., Delaney, C. P., Senagore, A. J., Banbury, M. K., Remzi, F. H., Kiran, R. P., et al. Prospective assessment of the predictive value of alpha-glutathione S-transferase for intestinal ischemia. Am. Surg., 2003; 69: 324–329.
29. Evennett, N. J., Petrov, M. S., Mittal, A., Windsor, J. A. Systematic and pooled estimates for the diagnostic accurancy and serological markers for intestinal ischemia. World J. Surg., 2009; 33: 1374–1383.
30. Sizlan, A., Guven, A., Uysal, B., Yanarates, O., Atim, A., et al. Proanthocyanidin protects intestine and remote organs against mesenteric ischemia/reperfusion injury. World J. Surg., 2009; 33: 1384–1391.
31. Edwards, E. M., Cherr, G. S., Crave, T. E., Olsen, A. W., Plonk, G. W., Geary, R. L., et al. Acute occlusive mesenteric ischemia: Surgical management and outcomes. Annals of vascular surgery, 2003; 17: 72–79.
Labels
Surgery Orthopaedics Trauma surgeryArticle was published in
Perspectives in Surgery
2010 Issue 4
Most read in this issue
- Malignant Ascites – Optional Management using Hyperthermic Peroperative Chemotherapy (HIPEC)
- Mesenteric Ischemia – Late Diagnosis or Managed Disease?
- Stapler Procedure for Anal Prolapse and Hemorrhoids: Long-term Results
- Rare Tumors of the Gallbladder and Bile Ducts. A Case Review