Portal Vein Embolization – Increased Chance for Liver Resecability for Malignancies
Authors:
V. Liška 1; V. Třeška 1; H. Mírka 2; M. Novák 2; F. Šlauf 2; T. Skalický 1; A. Sutnar 1; S. Kormunda 1
Authors‘ workplace:
Chirurgická klinika, FN Plzeň-Lochotín, LF UK v Plzni, přednosta: prof. MUDr. V. Třeška, DrSc.
1; Radiodiagnostická klinika, FN Plzeň-Lochotín, LF UK v Plzni, přednosta: doc. MUDr. B. Kreuzberg, CSs.
2
Published in:
Rozhl. Chir., 2007, roč. 86, č. 2, s. 97-101.
Category:
Monothematic special - Original
Overview
Introduction:
Liver surgery for liver malignancy is recently limited not by technical possibilities but by physiological reserves of liver parenchyma. Portal vein embolization (PVE) is performed to increase future liver remnant volume (FLRV) to extend the possibilities of liver resections. The authors evaluate the cohort of patients, that underwent PVE and confront them with the cohort of patients that underwent liver resection without PVE.
Methodology:
At the Department of Surgery and Departement of Radiology, University Hospital Pilsen there were performed successfully PVE at 24 patients between January 2001 and August 2006. The increase of FLRV was sufficient at 17 patients. The mean period between PVE and computed tomography volumetry was 29 days. The mean period between PVE and surgical procedure was 54 days. 8 patients underwent radical liver surgery (right hepatectomy, extended right hepatectomy, combination of right hepatectomy with RFA in left lobe), 3 patients underwent radiofrequency ablation, the rest of patients was explored.For comparison we used cohort of 107 patients that underwent one step radical surgery for malignancy.
Results:
1 year survival rate after liver operation was 85.7%, 3 years survival rate 42.9%. Disease free interval (DFI) was counted only for group of radicaly operated patients. One year DFI was 40%, two year DFI was 20%. The number of leasions was not proved as statistically significant for DFI or survival rate. In non PVE group 1 year survival rate was 78.9%, 3 years survival rate was 34.0%, one year DFI was 60.2%, two years DFI was 36.6%.
Discussion:
The survival rate was higher in PVE group, the DFI was shortened in PVE group. In our cohort we could conclude, the PVE increase survival rate instead of shortened DFI. PVE spreads possibilities for liver resections at patients with small FLVR and enables radical surgical therapy for patients, that will be leaved a palliative surgery or oncological therapy.
Key word:
liver malignancy – portal vein emboization – liver resection – RFA – overal survival – DFI
Sources
1. Rous, P., Larimore, L. D. Relation of the portal flow to liver maintenance. A demonstration of liver atrophy conditional on compensation. J. Exp. Med., 1920, 31: 609–632.
2. Starzl, T., Francavilla, A., Halgrimson, C. The origin, hormonal nature, and action of hepatotrophic substances in portal venous blood. Surg. Gynecol. Obstet, 1973, 137: 179–199.
3. Imamura, H., Shimada, R., Kubota, M. Preoperative portal vein embolization: An audit of 84 patients. Hepatology, 1999, 29: 1099–1105.
4. Komori, K., Nagino, M., Nimura, Y. Hepatocyte morphology and kinetics after portalvein embolization. Br. J. Surg., 2006, 93: 745–751.
5. Makuuchi, M., Thai, B.L., Takayasu, K., Takayama, T., Kosuge, T., Gunven, P. Preoperative portal embolization to increase safety of major hepatectomy for hilar bile duct carcinoma: A preliminary report. Surgery, 1990, 107: 521–527.
6. Makuuchi, M., Takayasu, K., Takayama, T. Preoperative transcatheter embolization of portal venous branch for patient receiving extended lobectomy du to the bile duct carcinoma. J. Jpn. Soc. Clin. Surg., 1984, 45: 14–20.
7. Elias, D., de Baere, T., Roche, A., Ducreux, M., Leclere, J., Lasser, P. During liver regenration following righ portal embolization the growth rate of liver metastases is more rapod than that of the liver parenchyma. Br. J. Surg., 1999, 86: 784–788.
8. Abdalla, E. K., Hicks, M. E., Vauthey, J. N. Portal vein embolization: Rationale, technique and future prospects. Br. J. Surg., 2001, 88: 165–175.
9. Hemming, A. W., Reed, A. I., Howard, R. J. Preoperative portal vein embolization for extended hepatectomy. Ann. Surg., 2004, 237: 686–693.
10. Kubota, K, Makuuchi, M, Kusaka, K. Measurement of liver volume and hepatic functional rserve as a guide to decision-making in resectional surgery for hepatic tumors. Hepatology, 1997, 26: 1176–1181.
11. de Baere, T., Roche, A., Elias, D., Lasser, P., Lagrange, C., Bousson, V. Preoperative portal vein embolization for extension of hepatectomy indications. Hepatology, 1996, 24: 1386–1391.
12. Azoulay, D., Castaing, D., Smail, A., Adam, R., Cailliez, V., Laurent, A., Lemoine, A., Bismuth, H. Resection of non-resectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer after percutaneus portal vein embolization. Ann. Surg., 2000, 4: 480–486.
13. Elias, D., Ouellet, J. F., de Baere, T., Lasser, P., Roche, A. Preoperative selective portal vein embolization before hepatectomy for liver metastases: long term results and impact on survival. Surgery, 2002, 131: 294–299.
14. Kokudo, N., Tda, K., Seki, M., Ohta, H., Azekura, K, Ueno, M., Ohta, K., Yamaguchi, T., Matsubara, T., Nakajima, T., Muto, T., Ikari, T., Yanagisawa, A., Kato, Y. Proliferative activity of intrahepatic colorectal metastases after preoperative hemihepatic portal vein embolization. Hepatology, 2001, 34: 267–272.
15. Tarazov, P. G., Granov, D. A., Sergeev, V. I., Polikarpov, A. A., Polysalov, V. N., Rozengauz, E. V. Preoperative portal vein embolization for liver malignancies. Hepatogastroenterology, 2006, 53: 566–570.
16. Urata, K., Kawasaki, S., Matsunami, H., Hashikura, Y., Ikegami, T., Ishizone, S. Calculation of child and adult standard liver volume for liver transplantation. Hepatology, 1995, 21: 317–321.
17. Fusai, G., Davidson, B. R. Strategies to increase the resectability of liver metastases from colorectal cancer. Dig. Surg., 2003, 20: 481–496.
18. Selzner, N., Pestalozzi, B. C., Kadry, Z., Selzner, M., Wildermuth, S., Clavien, P. A. Downstaging colorectal liver metastases by concomitant unilateral portal vein ligation and selective intra-arterial chemotherapy. Br. J. Surg., 2006, 93, 587–592.
19. Joyeux, H., Collet, H., Saint-Aubert, B., Faurous, P., Peraldi, D., Liu, Y, Domergue, J., Foucou, B., Solassol, C. Mise au point par gammatographie computerisée d@un index pondéral hépatique au cours de la régénération du foie. Gastroénterol. Clin. Biol., 1984, 8: 507–511.
20. Třeška, V. 2006 – zatím nepublikovaná data
21. Stefano, D., de Baere, T., Denys, A., Gorin, G., Gillet, M. Preoperative percutaneus portal vein embolization: evaluation of adverse events in 188 patients. Radiology, 2005, 234: 625–630.
22. Harada, H., Imamura, H., Miyagawa, S., Kawasaki, S. Fate of human liver after hemihepatic portal vein embolization: Cell kinetic and morphometric study. Hepatology, 1997, 26: 1162–1170.
23. Nanashima, A., Sumida, Y, Shibasaki, S., Takeshita, H., Hidaka, S. Parameters associated with changes in liver volume in patients undergoing portal vein embolization. J. Surg. Res., 2006, 133: 95–101.
24. Kusaka, K, Imamura, H., Tomiya, T., Makuuchi, M. Factors affecting regeneration after portal vein embolization. Hepatogastroenterology, 2004, 51: 532–535.
25. Gruttadauria, S., Luca, A., Mandala, L., Miraglia, R., Gridelli, B. Sequential preoperative ipsilateral portal and arterial embolization in patients with colorectal liver metastases. World J. Surg., 2006, 30: 576–578.
26. Vetelainen, R., Dinant, S., van Vliet, A., van Gulik, T. M. Portal vein ligation is as effective as sequential portal vein and hepatic artery ligation in inducing contralateral liver hypertrophy in rat model. J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol., 2006, 17: 1181–1188.
27. Goere, D., Farges, O., Leporrier, J., Sauvanet, A., Vilgrain, V., Belghiti, J. Chemotherapy does not impair hyertrophy of the left liver after right portal vein obstruction. Gastrointest. Surg., 2006, 10: 365–370.
28. Ogata, S., Belghiti, J., Farges, O., Varma, D., Sibert, A., Vilgrain, V. Sequential arterial and portal vein embolization before right hepatectomy in patients with cirhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Br. J. Surg., 2006, 93: 1091–1098.
29. Bismuth, H., Adam, R., Levi, F., Farabos, C., Waechter, F., Castaing, D. Resection of nonresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Ann. Surg., 1996, 224: 509–522.
30. Duncan, J. R., Hicks, M. E., Cai, S. R., Brunt, E. M., Ponder, K. P. Embolization of portal vein branches induces hepatocyte replication in swine: a potential step in gene therapy. Radiology, 1999, 210: 467–477.
31. Sigel, B., Pechet, G., Que, M. Y., MacDonald, R. A. Trittiated thymidine autoradiography in the regenerating liver of the dog. J. Surg. Res., 1965, 45: 72–78.
Labels
Surgery Orthopaedics Trauma surgeryArticle was published in
Perspectives in Surgery
2007 Issue 2
Most read in this issue
- Biliary Ileus – A Missed Out Cause of Intestinal Obstruction
- Appendectomy – Comparison of Results of Laparoscopy versus Open Surgery
- Multiple Lung Metastasectomy for the Poor Differentiated Metastatic Synovial Sarcoma
- Laparoscopic Liver Resection