#PAGE_PARAMS# #ADS_HEAD_SCRIPTS# #MICRODATA#

Percutaneous vs. Open Repair of the Subcutaneous Achilles Tendon Rupture


Authors: M. Sirový;  M. Carda
Authors‘ workplace: Oddělení úrazové chirurgie Krajské nemocnice Pardubice, primář MUDr. M. Carda ;  Fakulta zdravotnických studií Univerzity Pardubice, prof. MUDr. A. Pellant, DrSc. ;  Chirurgická klinika Krajské nemocnice Pardubice, přednosta doc. MUDr. K. Havlíček, CSc.
Published in: Rozhl. Chir., 2007, roč. 86, č. 11, s. 594-599.
Category: Monothematic special - Original

Overview

Introduction:
The authors assess and compare results of percutaneous and open repair of closed Achilles tendon rupture

Method and clinical material:
The authors retrospectively examined 115 patients with subcutaneous Achilles tendon rupture who were treated in the Regional Hospital of Pardubice during the years 2000–2005. They used the 100 point Hannover Achilles Tendon Score. 42 patients were operated on exclusively with percutaneous technique and 73 patients with open repair of Achilles tendon. Duration of the rehabilitation, post-operative complications and using of alternative fixation system in a post-operative treatment of Achilles tendon rupture were also assessed.

Results:
62 % of evaluated patients achieved good or excellent results. There was no significant difference between the open and percutaneous repair. In a case of percutaneous repair there was achieved a shortening of post-fixation rehabilitation time in compare with open repair about two weeks. Eighteen postoperative complications were identified after open Achilles tendon repair, resulting in institutional complication rate of 24.7 %. The complications included 6 (8.2%) superficial wound infections, 7 (9.6%) deep crural flebothromboses, 4 (5.5%) re-ruptures and 1 (1.4%) sural nerve injury.

Seven postoperative complications were identified after percuaneous Achilles tendon repair, resulting in institutional complication rate of 11.8 %. The complications included 3 (7.1%) sural nerve injury and 2 (4.7%) deep crural flebothromboses.

The vacuum brace system VacoAchill was used in 23 patients and involved in shortening of duration of rehabilitation about 20%.

Conclusion:
Percutaneous suture of Achilles tendon rupture is a simple and safety method, that brings comparable functional results to open repair with the same time of post-operative fixation and with a significantly lower rate of complications. The vacuum brace system VacoAchill is an alternative method of post-operative fixation allowing earlier mobilization and shortening patient’s disability.

Key words:
Achilles tendon rupture – percutaneous repair – Thompsons test


Sources

1. Maffulli, N., Renstrom, P., Leadbette, W. B. Tendon Injuries: Basic Science and Clinical Medicine. Springer-Verlag London Limited, 2005, 187–199, ISBN 1-85233-503-3.

2. Bulstrode, Ch., Buckwalter, J., Carr, A., Marsh, L., Fairbank, J., Wilson-MacDonald, J., Bowden, G. Oxford Textbook of Orthopedics and Trauma. Oxford University Press, 2002, 1300-1302, ISBN 0-19-262681-7.

3. Canale, S. T., et al. Campbell Operative Orthopaedics. 10. vydání, Mosby, Inc., Philadelphia, 2003, 2458-2465, ISBN 0-323-01240-X.

4. Józsa, L. G., Kannus, P. Human Tendons: Anatomy, Physiology and Pathology. Human Kinetics, 1997, 513-517, ISBN 0-87322-484-1.

5. Lim, J., Dalal, R., Waseem, M. Pecutaneus vs. Open Repair of the Ruptured Achilles Tendon – A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study. Foot and Ancle, 2001, 22: 559–565.

6. Gorschewsky, O., Vogel, U., Schweizer, A., Laar, V. B. Percutaneous tenodesis of the Achilles tendon – A new surgical method fot the treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture through percutaneous tenodesis. Injury, 1999, 30: 315–321.

7. Cretnik, A., Kosanovic, M., Smrkolj, V. Percutaneus versus open repair of the ruptured Achilles tendon: a comparative study. Am. J. Sports Med., 2005, 33: 1369–1379.

8. Riedl, S., Sandberger, L., Nitschmann, K., Meeder, P. J. Suture of fresh Achilles tendon rupture. Comparison of open with percutaneus suture technique. Chirurg, 2002, 73: 607–614.

9. Maes, R., Copin, G., Averous, C. Is percutaneus repair od the Achilles tendon a safe technique? A study of 124 cases. Acta Orthop. Belg., 2006, 72: 179–183.

10. Wagon, R., Akkayi, M. The Webb-Banister percutaneus technique for Acute Achilles tendon ruptures: a functional and MRI assessment. J. Foot Ankle Surg., 2005, 44: 437–444.

11. Hufner, T. M., Brades, D. B., Thermann, H., Richter, M., Knobloch, K., Kretek, C. Long-term results after functional momoperative tratment of achilles tendon rupture. Foot Ankle Int., 2006, 27: 167–171.

12. Suchak, A. A., Spooner, C., Reid, D. C., Jomha, N. M. Postoperative rehabilitation protocols for Achilles tendon ruptures: a meta-analysis. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res., 2006, 445: 216–221.

13. Majewski, M., Rickert, M., Steinbruck, K. Achilles tendon rupture. A prospetive study assessing various treatment possibilities. Orthopade, 2000, 29: 670–676.

14. Calder, J. D., Saxby, T. S. Early, active rehabilitation following mini-open repair of Achilles tendon rupture: prospective study. Br. J. Sports Med., 2005, 39: 857–859.

15. Majewski, M., Rohrbach, M., Czaja, S., Ochsner, P. Avoiding sural nerve injuries during percutaneous achiles tendon repair. Am. J. Sports Med., 2006, 34: 793–798.

16. Miller, D., Waterson, S., Reaper, J., Barras, V., Maffulli, N. Conservative management, percutaneous or open repair of acute Achilles tendon rupture: a retropective study. Scott. Med. J., 2005, 50: 160–165.

17. Bredlez, J. P., Tibone, J. E. Percutaneous and open surgical repairs of Achilles tendon ruptures.A comparative study. Am. J. Sports Med., 1990, 18: 188–195.

18. Ma, G. W. C., Griffith, T. G. Percutaneous repair of acute closed ruptured Achilles tendon. A new technique. Clin. Orthop., 1977, 128: 247–255.

19. Fitzgibbons, R. E., Hefferon, J., Hill, J. Parcutaneous Achilles tendon repair. Am. J. Sposts Med., 1993, 21: 724–727.

20. Hynes, R. A. Percutaneous Achilles tendon repair. Orthop. Trans., 1989, 13: 598.

21. Rowley, D. I., Scotland, T. R. Rupture of the Achilles tendon treated by a simple operative procedure. Injury, 1982, 14: 252–254.

Labels
Surgery Orthopaedics Trauma surgery
Login
Forgotten password

Enter the email address that you registered with. We will send you instructions on how to set a new password.

Login

Don‘t have an account?  Create new account

#ADS_BOTTOM_SCRIPTS#