#PAGE_PARAMS# #ADS_HEAD_SCRIPTS# #MICRODATA#

The value of ultrasound evaluation in predicting high-grade vesicoureteral reflux in children under two years of age


Authors: Oldřich Šmakal 1;  Jan Šarapatka 1;  Jan Vrána 1;  Hana Flögelová 2;  Tereza Kleštincová 2
Authors‘ workplace: Urologická klinika, LF UP a FN Olomouc 1;  Dětská klinika, LF UP a FN Olomouc 2
Published in: Ces Urol 2018; 22(1): 32-39
Category: Original Articles

Overview

The main aspect of the paper:
A prospective study evaluated the benefit of ultrasound evaluation in predicting grade IV–V vesicoureteral reflux in children aged 0–2 years investigated for asymptomatic upper urinary tract dilation detected on ultrasound screening or after having had acute pyelonephritis.

Aim:
To assess the value of ultrasound evaluation in predicting grade IV–V vesicoureteral reflux in children aged 0–2 years investigated for postnatal detection of upper urinary tract dilation or after having had acute pyelonephritis.

Method:
In a prospective study, the measured ultrasound parameters of the upper urinary tract (anteroposterior renal pelvis diameter, parenchymal thickness, and ureteral width) were compared with the results of voiding cystourethrography in two cohorts of patients aged 0−2 years. Patient cohort 1 was investigated for postnatal detection of upper urinary tract dilation, while patient cohort 2 included those who had had acute pyelonephritis. Fisher’s test at the 5% significance level, chisquare test, and logistic regression test were used for statistical analysis.

Results:
Voiding cystourethrography was performed in 101 children in patient cohort 1. Grade IV–V vesicoureteral reflux was shown in 22 children (21.8%) – 5 girls (23%) and 17 boys (77%). The mean age at which a VCUG was performed in this patient cohort was 3.95 months, with a median of 3 months (1–22). A ureter ≥3 mm was found in 12 children (55%) and a renal pelvis ≥5 mm in 21 children (95%). The statistical analysis failed to find a statistically significant association between the observed ultrasound parameters and evidence of grade IV–V vesicoureteral reflux.

In patient cohort 2, voiding cystourethrography was carried out in 84 children. Grade IV–V vesicoureteral reflux was found in 24 children (28.6%) – 11 girls (46%), 13 boys (54%). The mean age at which a VCUG demonstrating high-grade vesicoureteral reflux was performed was 6.55 months, with a median of 4.5 months (1–17). A ureter ≥3 mm was detected in 9 children (41%) and a renal pelvis ≥5 mm in 19 children (86%). The statistical analysis demonstrated a significant association between a transverse diameter of the renal pelvis ≥5 mm in 19 children (86%). The statistical analysis demonstrated a significant association between a transverse diameter of the renal pelvis <8 mm and evidence of grade IV–V vesicoureteral reflux (p = 0.037) as well as between a parenchymal thickness <8 mm and evidence of grade IV–V vesicoureteral reflux (p = 0.019).

Conclusion:
In patients aged 0–2 years with ultrasound screening evidence of upper urinary tract dilation, ultrasound evaluation of renal pelvis and ureteral diameter or of parenchymal thickness fails to predict high-grade vesicoureteral reflux. In patients aged 0–2 years who had acute pyelonephritis, transverse diameter of the renal pelvis below 8 mm and/or parenchymal reduction of less than 8 mm are indicative of the presence of grade IV–V vesicoureteral reflux.

Key words:
Children, voiding cystourethrography, ultrasound, vesicoureteral reflux.


Sources

1. Sargent MA. What is the normal prevalence of vesicoureteral reflux? Pediatr Radiol. 2000; 30: 587-593.

2. Skoog SJ, Peters CA, Arant BS Jr, et al. Pediatric vesicoureteral reflux guidelines panel summary report: clinical practice guidelines for screening siblings of children with vesicoureteral reflux and neonates/infants with prenatal hydronephrosis. J Urol. 2010; 184: 1145-1151.

3. Montini G, Tullus K, Hewitt I. Febrile urinary tract infections in children. N Engl J Med 2011; 365: 239-250.

4. Fairhurst JJ, Rubin CM, Hyde I, et al. Bladder capacity in infants. J Pediatr Surg 1991; 26(1): 55-57.

5. Nevéus T, von Gontard A, Hoebeke P, et al. The standardization of terminology of lower urinary tract function in childrenand adolescents: Report from the standardisation committee of the International Children's Continence Society. J Urol 2006; 176: 314-324.

6. Lebowitz RL, Olbing H, Parkkulainen KV, et al. International system of radiographic grading of vesicoureteric reflux. International Reflux Study in Children. Pediatr Radiol 1985; 15(2): 105-109.

7. Riccabona M, Avni FE, Blickman JG, et al. Imaging recommendations in paediatric uroradiology: minutes of the ESPR workgroup session on urinary tract infection, fetal hydronephrosis, urinary tract ultrasonography and voiding cystourethrography, Barcelona, Spain, June 2007. Pediatr Radiol. 2008; 38(2): 138-145.

8. Ismaili K, Hall M, Piepsz A, et al. Primary vesicoureteral reflux detected in neonates with a history of fetal renal pelvis dilatation: a prospective clinical and imaging study. J Pediatr. 2006; 148(2): 222-227.

9. Shokeir AA, Nijman RJ. Antenatal hydronephrosis: changing concepts in diagnosis and subsequent management. BJU Int. 2000; 85(8): 987-994.

10. Brophy MM, Austin PF, Yan Y, Coplen DE. Vesicoureteral reflux and clinical outcomes in infants with prenatally detected hydronephrosis. J Urol 2002; 168: 1716-1719.

11. Phan VR, Traubici J, Hershenfield B, et al. Vesicoureteral reflux in infants with isolated antenatal hydronephrosis. Pediatr Nephrol 2003; 18: 1224-1228.

12. Bouachrine H, Lemelle JL, Didier F, et al. A follow‑up study of prenatally detected primary vesicoureteric reflux: a review of 61 patients. Br J Urol 1996; 78: 936-939.

13. Avni FE, Hall M, Rypens F. The postnatal work‑up of congenital uronephropathies. In: Baert AL, Sartor K (eds) Pediatric uroradiology. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, New York 2001: 321-336.

14. Yiee J, Wilcox D. Management of fetal hydronephrosis Pediatr Nephrol. 2008; 23(3): 347-353.

15. Riccabona M. Assessment and management of newborn hydronephrosis. World J Urol. 2004; 22(2): 73-78.

16. Becker AM. Postnatal evaluation of infants with an abnormal antenatal renal sonogram. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2009; 21(2): 207-213.

17. Lee RS, Cendron M, Kinnamon DD, et al. Antenatal hydronephrosis as a predictor of postnatal outcome: a metaanalysis. Pediatrics 2006; 118: 586-593.

18. Nepple KG, Arlen AM, Austin JC, Cooper CS. The prognostic impact of an abnormal initial renal ultrasound on early reflux resolution. J Pediatr Urol 2011; 7: 462-466.

19. Preda I, Jodal U, Sixt R, Stokland E, Hansson S. Value of ultrasound in evaluation of infants with first urinary tract infection. J Urol 2010; 183: 1984-1988.

20. Nguyen HT, Herndon CD, Cooper C, et al. The Society for Fetal Urology consensus statement on the evaluation and management of antenatal hydronephrosis. J Pediatr Urol. 2010; 6(3): 212-231.

21. Subcommittee on Urinary Tract Infection, Steering Committee on Quality Improvement and Management. Urinary Tract Infection: Clinical Practice Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of the Initial UTI in Febrile Infants and Children2 to 24 Months. Pediatrics 2011; 128: 595-610.

22. Geier P, Feber J. Nové aspekty diagnostiky a léčby infekce močových cest u kojenců a batolat. Pediatr. praxi 2013; 14(5): 296-297.

23. Akil I, Ozkol M, Ikizoglu OY, et al. Premedication during micturating cystourethrogram to achieve sedation and anxiolysis. Pediatr Nephrol 2005; 20: 1106-1110.

24. Woodward M, Frank D. Postnatal management of antenatal hydronephrosis. BJU Int. 2002; 89(2): 149-156.

25. Zerin M, Ritchney M, Chang A. Incidental vesicoureteral reflux in neonates with antenatally detected hydronephrosis and other renal abnormalities. Radiology 1993; 187: 157-160.

26. Herndon CD. Antenatal hydronephrosis: differential diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment options. ScientificWorldJournal. 2006; 6: 2345-2365.

27. Gloor JM, Ramsey PS, Ogburn Jr PL, et al. The association of isolated mild fetal hydronephrosis with postnatal vesicoureteral reflux. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2002; 12: 196-200.

Labels
Paediatric urologist Nephrology Urology

Article was published in

Czech Urology

Issue 1

2018 Issue 1

Most read in this issue
Login
Forgotten password

Enter the email address that you registered with. We will send you instructions on how to set a new password.

Login

Don‘t have an account?  Create new account

#ADS_BOTTOM_SCRIPTS#