Impalpable testis, what first: diagnostic laparoscopy or inguinal exploration?
Authors:
Marcel Drlík; Radim Kočvara
Authors‘ workplace:
Urologická klinika 1. LF UK a VFN, Praha
; Oddělení dětské urologie
Published in:
Ces Urol 2011; 15(2): 101-107
Category:
Original article
Overview
Aim:
Management of impalpable testis remains controversial so far. Although laparoscopy has been accepted by many paediatric urologists as a diagnostic approach of choice, the others advocate primary inguinal exploration due to its simplicity. The aim of this study was to evaluate the benefit of diagnostic laparoscopy in the management of impalpable testis.
Material and methods:
We reviewed the findings of diagnostic laparoscopy performed on 57 boys (18 right side, 31 left side, 8 bilateral) with 65 impalpable testis from January 1999 to January 2010. The patients age varied from 4 months to 17 years (mean 47 months). Only impalpable testes, confirmed under general anesthesia, were selected for the study.
Results:
In total of 65 testicular units three groups were created. In 18 cases we found intra-abdominal blind ending internal spermatic vessels and vas (anorchia), cord structures entering the inguinal ring were observed in 22 cases, in 25 cases we found intra-abdominal testis. In 13 cases intra-abdominal testes were located highly and treated with:two steps Fowler- Stephens operation (6), autotransplantation (2), laparoscopicaly assisted orchiopexy (3) and orchiectomy (2). Remaining 12 cases of intra-abdominal testes were placed close to internal inguinal ring and treated with open orchiopexy through inguinal access.
Conclusion:
Diagnostic laparoscopy is the only reliable method to confirm anorchia or presence of highly located intra-abdominal testis. If all 57 boys underwent open inguinal exploration at first, 31 boys (54%) (18 boys with anorchia and 13 with highly intraabdominaly located testes) should inevitably undergo later laparoscopy and second general anesthesia. Only in 26 boys (46%), the open inguinal exploration could establish final diagnosis. However, hypoplastic testis could be overlooked. Therefore we strongly recommend laparoscopy as an initial diagnostic method of choice. The boys with impalpable testis should be referred to a paediatric urology centre with available laparoscopy equipment and educated staff.
Key words:
diagnostic laparoscopy, impalpable testis, cryptorchism.
Sources
1. Levitt SB, Kogan SJ, Engel RM, et al. The impalpable testes: a rational approach to management. J Urol 1978; 120: 515–520.
2. Wood HM, Elder JS. Cryptorchidism and testicular cancer: separating fact from fiction. javascript:AL_get(this, ‚jour‘, ‚J Urol.‘); J Urol 2009; 181(2): 452–461.
3. Hadziselimovic F, Herzog B. The importance of both and early orchidopexy and germ cell maturation for fertility. Lancet 2001; 358: 1156–1157.
4. Huff DS, Hadziselimovic F, Snyder HM 3rd, et al. Histologic maldevelopment of unilaterally cryptorchid testes and their descended partners. J Eur Pediatr 1993; 152(Suppl 2): S11–S14.
5. Tekgül S, Riedmiller H, Gerharz E, et al. Guidelines on Pediatric Urology. In: European Association of Urology Guidelines 2009 ed. Arnhem: EAU; 2009: 9.
6. Cortesi N, Ferrrari P, Zambarda E, et al. Diagnosis of bilateral abdominal cryptorchidism by laparoscopy. Endoscopy 1976; 8: 33–34.
7. Teyschl O, Tůma J. Využití laparoskopie při diagnostice, klasifikaci a léčbě nehmatného nesestouplého varlete. Rozhl Chir 2000; 79(11): 557–560.
8. Mesrobian HG, Chassaignac JM, Laud PW. The presence or absence of an impalpable testis can be predicted from clinical observations alone. BJU Int 2002; 90(1): 97–99.
9. Kolon TF, Patel RP, Huff DS. Cryptorchidism: diagnosis, treatment, and long-term prognosis. Urol Clin North Am 2004; 31(3): 469–480.
10. Moore RG, Peters CA, Bauer SB, Mandell J, Retik AB. Laparoscopic evaluation of the nonpalpable tests: a prospective assessment of accuracy. J Urol 1994; 151(3): 728–731.
11. Tennenbaum SY, Lerner SE, McAleer IM, et al. Preoperative laparoscopic localization of the nonpalpable testis: a critical analysis of a 10-year experience. J Urol 1994; 151(3): 732–734.
12. Cisek LJ, Peters CA, Atala A, et al. Current findings in diagnostic laparoscopic evaluation of the nonpalpable testis. J Urol 1998; 160(3): 1145–1149.
13. Huff DS, Wu HY, Snyder HM 3rd, Hadziselimović F, Blythe B, Duckett JW. Evidence in favor of the mechanical (intrauterine torsion) theory over the endocrinopathy (cryptorchidism) theory in the pathogenesis of testicular agenesis. J Urol 1991; 146(2): 630–631.
14. Kočvara R. Kryptorchismus: kdy načasovat a jakou léčbu provést. Urol List 2007; 5(1): 30–33.
15. Lakhoo K, Thomas DF, Najmaldin AS. Is inguinal exploration for the impalpable testis an outdated operation? Br J Urol 1996; 77(3): 452–454.
16. Barqawi AZ, Blyth B, Jordan GH, et al. Role of laparoscopy in patients with previous negative exploration for impalpable testis. Urology 2003; 61(6): 1234–1237.
17. Lima M, Bertozzi M, Ruggeri G, et al. The nonpalpable testis: an experience of 132 consecutive videolaparoscopic explorations in 6 years. Pediatr Med Chir 2002; 24(1): 37–40.
Labels
Paediatric urologist Nephrology UrologyArticle was published in
Czech Urology
2011 Issue 2
Most read in this issue
- Lichen sclerosus – commonly overlooked urological diagnosis with serious complications
- Neural control of the lower urinary tract
- Impalpable testis, what first: diagnostic laparoscopy or inguinal exploration?
- Carbonic anhydrase IX (CA IX) expression in renal cell carcinoma and transitional cell carcinoma of urinary tract