Role of prebioptic and bioptic methodsin the screening and diagnosis of cervical cancer

Czech version

Authors: V. Dvořák ¹; R. Pilka ²
Authors‘ workplace: Centrum ambulantní gynekologie a primární péče, Brno ¹; Gynekologicko-porodnická klinika FN a LF UP, Olomouc, přednosta prof. MUDr. R. Pilka, Ph. D. ²
Published in: Ceska Gynekol 2014; 79(2): 88-97

Overview

Objective:
To describe the available prebioptical and bioptical methods used in screening and diagnosis of cervical cancer.

Design:
Review article.

Setting:
Center of outpatient gynecology and primary care, Brno; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, Olomouc.

Subjects and methods of the study:
In a review article there are outlines of the prebioptical investigative techniques and related diagnostics aim to detect, verificate and treat cervical lesions. It describes and compares various methods, including their mutual correlation.

Conclusion:
The oncological cytology, colposcopy and HPV testing have an irreplaceable role in diagnosis of cervical cancer. Appropriate combination gives us a chance to achieve high sensitivity in detection of severe lesions of the cervix.

Keywords:
cervical cancer, colposcopy, oncological cytology, HPV testing, CIN, conization

Sources

1. Berkhof, J., Bogaards, JA. Vaccination against human papillomavirus types 16 and 18: the impact on cervical cancer. Future Oncol, 2010, 6(12), p. 1817–1821.

2. Birner, P., Obermair, A., Schindl, M., et al. Selective immunohistochemical staining of blood and lymphatic vessels reveals independent prognostic influence of blood and lymphatic vessel invasion in early-stage cervical cancer. Clin Cancer Res, 2001, 7(1), p. 93–97.

3. Bulten, J., van der Laak, JA., Gemmink, JH., et al. MIB1, a promising marker for the classification of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. J Pathol, 1996, 178(3), p. 268–273.

4. Celik, C., Gezginc, K., Toy, H., et al. A comparison of liquid-based cytology with conventional cytology. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2008, 100(2), p. 163–166.

5. Costa, MJ., Grimes, C., Tackett, E., et al. Cervicovaginal cytology in an indigent population. Comparison of results for 1964, 1981 and 1989. Acta Cytol, 1991, 35(1), p. 51–56.

6. Costa, S., Nuzzo, MD., Rubino, A., et al. Independent determinants of inaccuracy of colposcopically directed punch biopsy of the cervix. Gynecol Oncol, 2003, 90(1), p. 57–63.

7. Cuzick, J., Clavel, C., Petry, KU., et al. Overview of the European and North American studies on HPV testing in primary cervical cancer screening. Int J Cancer, 2006, 119(5), p. 1095–1101.

8. Herbeck, G., Ondruš, J., Dvořák, V., Mortakis, A. Atlas kolposkopie. Praha: Maxdorf, 2011.

9. Monsonego, J., Hudgens, MG., Zerat, L., et al. Evaluation of oncogenic human papillomavirus RNA and DNA tests with liquid-based cytology in primary cervical cancer screening: the FASE study. Int J Cancer, 2011, 129(3), p. 691–701.

10. Obermair, A., Wanner, C., Bilgi, S., et al. The influence of vascular space involvement on the prognosis of patients with stage IB cervical carcinoma: correlation of results from hematoxylin and eosin staining with results from immunostaining for factor VIII-related antigen. Cancer, 1998, 82(4), p. 689–696.

11. Ostor, AG. Natural history of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a critical review. Int J Gynecol Pathol, 1993, 12(2), p. 186–192.

12. Rob, L. Onkologická prevence v gynekologii. Mod Gynekol Porod, 2003, p. 612–694.

13. Rokyta, Z. Diagnostic reliability of prebioptic methods in the prediction of a histological basis of cervical lesions and its correlation with accuracy of colposcopically directed biopsy in patients with cervical neoplasia. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol, 2000, 21(5), p. 484–486.

14. Solomon, D., Davey, D., Kurman, R., et al. The 2001 Bethesda System: terminology for reporting results of cervical cytology. JAMA, 2002, 287(16), p. 2114–2119.

15. Stafl, A., Mattingly, RF. Angiogenesis of cervical neoplasia. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1975, 121(6), p. 845–852.

16. Turyna, R., Sláma, J. Kolposkopie děložního hrdla. Praha: Galén, 2010.

17. Walker, P., Dexeus, S., De Palo, G., et al. International terminology of colposcopy: an updated report from the International Federation for Cervical Pathology and Colposcopy. Obstet Gynecol, 2003, 101(1), p. 175–177.

18. Waxman, AG. Low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion. Apgar, BS., Brotzman, GL., Spitzer, M., eds. Colposcopy: principles and practice: An integrated textbook and atlas. Philadelphia: Saunders, 2002, p. 255–265.

19. WHO. Human papillomavirus infection and cervical cancer. In: www.who.int/vaccine_research/diseases/hpv/en/; 2004.

20. WHO. Pathology and genetics of tumours of the breast and female genital organs. Lyon 2005.

21. www.svod.cz.