Fatherhood, Children and Family
Authors:
J. Pavlát
Authors‘ workplace:
Psychiatrická klinika, 1. LF UK a VFN, Praha
přednosta prof. MUDr. J. Raboch, DrSc.
Published in:
Čes. a slov. Psychiat., 104, 2008, No. 4, pp. 189-195.
Category:
Comprehensive Reports
Overview
Awareness of the importance of father’s care among expert is strong and clear. Great amount of empirical studies proves the father’s care and love has strong positive effect on social, emotional and cognitive progress and functioning of children and adolescent. Its deficit has a number of negative consequences. The most frequent cause of deficit of father’s care is divorce. The North American pediatric journal claims the 40% of American children experience divorce till the age of sixteen. The postdivorce situation surprisingly oft leads to minimal or no contact with the father. This state of things is mostly due to maternal gatekeeping. Children of divorce according to many studies thrive worst than children from intact families. Loss of family is getting the most frequent and most important risk for the successful development of children.
Findings of studies documenting the importance of father’s care and worst prosperity of children of divorce inspire searching for the postdivorce arrangement which minimize the loss of children. Programs are initiated which educate the divorcing parents.
Divorce rate in our republic is not as high as in the US but nevertheless the parallels are evident and we can expect our rate of divorce will increase. We will have to come up to this fact. We must seek the way how to minimize its consequences for the children.
Key words:
divorce, parental conflict, maternal gatekeeping, children well-being, fatherhood, family types.
Sources
1. Allen, S. M., Hawikins, A. J.: Maternal gatekeeping: Mothers´beliefs and behaviors that inhibit greater father Involvement in family work. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 1999, pp. 199-212.
2. Amato, P. R., & Keith, B.: Parental divorce and the well-being of children: A metaanalysis. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 1991a, pp. 26-46.
3. Amato, P. R., & Keith, B.: Parental divorce and adult well-being: A meta-analysis. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53, 1991b, pp. 43-58.
4. Amato, P. R.: Childrens´ adjustment to divorce: Theories, hypotheses, and empirical support. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55, 1993, pp. 23-38.
5. Amato, P. R.: Life-span adjustment of children to their parents’ divorce. Children and divorce. The Future of Our Children 4/1, 1994, pp. 143-164.
6. Amato, P. R.: More then money? Menś contributions to their children’s lives. In A. Booth & N. Crouter (Eds): Men in families: When do they get involved? What difference does it make? Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 1998, pp. 241-278.
7. Amato, P. R., Day, R. D., Lamb, M. E., Marsiglio, W.: Scholarship on fatherhood in the 1990s and beyond. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 2007, p. 1173.
8. Amneus, D.: The Garbage generation. The consequencies of destruction of the two-parent family and the need to stabilize it by strenghtening its weakest link, the father’s role. alhambra, Ca. Primrose Press, 1991.
9. Arditi, J. A.: Factors relating to custody, visitations, and child support for divorced fathers: An exploratory analysis. J. Div. Remarr., 17, 1992, pp. 23-42.
10. Arendell, T.: Fathers and divorce. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1995.
11. Bakalář, E., Novákovi, M. a D.: Průvodce rozvodem. Praha, Lidové noviny, 1996.
12. Barber, B., Thomas, D.: Dimensions of fathers’ and mothers’ supportive behavior: A case for physical affection. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 48, 1986, pp. 783-794.
13. Braver, S. L., O’Connell, D.: Divorced dads: Shattering the myths. New York, Tarcher/Putnam, 1998.
14. Brody, G. H., Moore, K., Glei, D.: Family processes during adolescence as predictors of parents-young adult attitude similarity: A six-year longitudinal analysis. Family Relations, 43, 1994, 369 373.
15. Dominy, N. L., Johnson, W. B., Koch, C.: Perception of parental acceptance in women with binge eating disorder. Journal of Psychology, 134, 2000, p. 2336.
16. Douthitt, R.: The division of labor within the home: Have gender roles changed? Sex roles, 20, 1988, pp. 693-704.
17. East, L., Jackson, D., O´Brien, L.: Father absence and adolescent development: a review of the literature. Journal of Child Health Care, 10, 2006, 4, pp. 283-295.
18. Ellis, B. J., Bates, J. E., Dodge, K. A., Fergusson, D. M., Horwood; J. L., Pettit, G. S., Woodward, L: Does father absence place daughters at special risk for early sexual activity and teenage pregnancy? Child Development, 74, 2003, 3, pp. 801-821.
19. Emery, R. E.: Marriage, divorce, and children’s adjustment (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1999.
20. Emery, R., E.: Marriage, divorce, and children’s adjustment. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 1988.
21. Emery, E., R., Wyer, M. M.: Divorce mediation. American Psychologist, 42, 1987, 2, pp. 472-480.
22. Fabricius, W. V., Luecken L. J.: Postdivorce living arrangements, parent conflict, and longterm physical health correlates for children of divorce. J. Fam. Psychol., 21, 2007, 2, pp. 195-205.
23. Fagan, J., Barnett, M.: The relationship between maternal gatekeeping, paternal competence, mothers’ attitudes about the father role, and father involvement. Journal of Family Issues, 24, 2003, pp. 1020–1043.
24. Feinberg, J. M., Loeb, L. S.: Custody and visitation interference: Alternative Remedies. AAML Journal, 12, 1994, pp. 271-284.
25. Feldman, S., Nash, S., Aschenbrenner, B.: Antecedents of fathering. Child development, 54, 1983, pp.1628-1636.
26. Furstenberg, F., Nord, C.: Parenting apart: Patterns of childrearing after marital disruption. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 47, 1985, pp. 893- 904.
27. Furstenberg, F., Morgan, S., Allison, P.: Paternal participation and children’s well-being after marital dissolution. American Sociological Review, 52, 1987 pp. 695-701.
28. Furstenberg, F., Cherlin, A.: Divided families: What happens to children when parents part. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 1991.
29. Gardner, R. A.: Syndrom zavrženého rodiče. Praha, Ministerstvo práce a sociálních věcí ČR, 1996.
30. Govind, P., Stein, R. E. K.: Contrast between behaviour and academic achievement for kindergarten children living in single parent families. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 25, 2004, 5, p. 376.
31. Hetherington, M. E., Bridges, M, Insabella, G. M.:What matters? What does not? Five perspectives on the association between. Marital transitions and children’s adjustment. American Psychologist, 53, 1998, 2, pp. 167-184.
32. Hetherington, E. M., Cox, M., Cox, R.: Effects of divorce on parents and children. In Lamb, M. (ed.): Nontraditional families, Hillsdale. NJ, Erlbaum, 1998.
33. Hetherington, E. M.: Should we stay together for the sake of the children? In E. M. Hetherington (ed.): Coping with divorce, single parenting, and remarriage. Mahwah, NJ,: Erlbaum, 1999, pp. 93–116.
34. Chen, X., Liu, M., Li, D.: Parental warmth control, and indulgence and their relations to adjustment in Chinese children: A longitudinal study. Journal of Family Psychology, 14, 2000, pp. 401 419.
35. Jones, C.: Father-infant relationships in the first year of life. In S. M. Hanson, F. W. Bozett (eds.): Dimensions of fatherhood. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1985, pp. 92- 114.
36. Kelly, J. B.: Developing beneficial- parenting. plan models for, children following separation and divorce. Parenting Following Separation and Divorce, 19, 2005, pp. 237-254.
37. Kelly, J. B.: Children’s living arrangements. Following. separation and divorce: Insights from empirical and clinical research. Family Process, 46, 2007, 1, pp. 35-52.
38. Kressel, K.: The process of divorce. New York, Basic Books, 1985.
39. Lamb, M. E.: The role of father in child development. New York, Wiley, 1981.
40. Lamb, M. E.: Fathers and child development: An introductory overview and guide. In M. E. Lamb (Ed.): The role of the father in child development. New York, Wiley, 1997, pp. 1-18.
41. McMunn, A. M., Nazroo, J. Y., Marmot, M. G., Boreham, R., Goodman, R.: Children’s emotional and behavioural well-being and the family environment: Findings from the health survey for England. Social Science and Medicine, 53, 2001, 4, pp. 423-440.
42. Meyers, S. A.: Adapting parent education programs to meet the need of fathers: An ecological perspective. Family Relations, 42, 1993, pp. 447-452.
43. Mott, F. L.: When is a father really gone? Paternal-child conduct in father-absent homes.. Demography, 27, 1990, pp. 499-517.
44. Pavlát J., Pavlovský P., Janáčková L.: K diskusi o syndromu odcizeného rodiče. Čes. a slov. Psychiat, 102, 2006, s. 376-380.
45. Pearson, J., Thoennes, N.: Divorce mediation research results, In J. Folberg, A. Milne (eds.): Divorce mediation: Theory and practice. New York, Guilford Press, 1988, pp. 429-452.
46. Pediatrics – commentary: Perental separation and divorce: Can we provide an ounce of prevention? Pediatrics, 110, 2002, pp. 1007-1009.
47. Pedro-Carroll, J. L.: Fostering resilience in the aftermath of divorce: The role of evidence-based programs for children. Family Court Review, 43, 2005, pp. 52–64.
48. Peterson, D. R., Becker, W. C., Shoemaker, D. J., Quay, H. C.: Parental attitudes and child adjustment. Child Development, 32, 1959, pp. 119-130.
49. Pfiffner, L. J., McBurnett, K., Rathouz, P. J.: Father absence and familial antisocial characteristics. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 29, 2001, 5, pp. 357-367.
50. Pruett, M. K.: Applications of attachment theory and child development research to young. children’s overnights in separated and divorced families, in overnights and young children. Essay from the Family Court Review, 2005, pp. 5-12.
51. Rohner, R. P., Veneziano, R. A.: The Importance of father love: history and contemporary evidence. Review of General Psychology, 5, 2001, 4, pp. 382-405.
52. Schüller, V. , Prokopec, J., Dytrych, Z.: Dítě jako „objekt“ v rozvodovém procesu. Demografie, 27, 1985, s. 221-227.
53. Smyth, B.: Time to rethink time? The experience of time with children after divorce. Family Matters, 71, 2005, pp. 4-10.
54. Sonenstein, Malm, K., Billing, A.: Study of fathers´involvement in permanency planning and child welfare casework. U.S, Department of Health and Human Services Report. Dostupné na http://aspe.hhs.gov/hsp/ CW-dads02/, 2002.
55. Spruijt, E., DeGoede, M., Vandervalk, I.: The well-being of youngsters coming from six different family types. Patient Education and Counseling, 45, 2001, 10, pp. 285-294.
56. Storksen, I., Roysamb, E., Holmen, T. L., Tambs, K.: Adolescent adjustment and well-being: effects of parental divorce and distress. Scand.. J..Psychol., 47, 2006, 1, pp. 75-84.
57. Starrels, M.: Gender differences in parent-child relations. Journal of Family Issues, 15, 1994, pp. 148-165.
58. Warschak, R. A.: Revoluce v porozvodové péči o děti. Praha, Ministerstvo práce a sociálních věcí ČR, 1995.
Labels
Addictology Paediatric psychiatry PsychiatryArticle was published in
Czech and Slovak Psychiatry
2008 Issue 4
Most read in this issue
- ADHD – Symptoms and Gender
- Clinical and Biological Markers of Persistent Form of Hyperkinetic Disorder (ADHD)
- Influencing Cognitive Deficit in Schizophrenia by Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
- ArginMax in the Treatment of Female Sexual Dysfunction