#PAGE_PARAMS# #ADS_HEAD_SCRIPTS# #MICRODATA#

Intravitreal Steroid and Anti-VEGF in Macular Edema Secondary to Retinal Vein Occlusion


Authors: Mario Carlos Rangel 1,2,6,7;  Alejandro Arias 3,8;  Alejandra María Gómez 1,2;  Marcos Restrepo 4;  Carolina Estrella 1,2,7;  Victoria Dora Nova 1,2,6;  Andrea Pinto 5,9
Authors‘ workplace: Departament of Ophthalmology, Fundacion Oftalmologica de Santander FOSCAL, Floridablanca, Colombia 1;  Centro Oftalmológico Virgilio Galvis, Floridablanca, Colombia. 2;  Departament of Ophthalmology, San José Hospital, Bogotá, Colombia 3;  Clínica de Oftalmología Sandiego, Medellín, Colombia. 4;  Clínica Oftalmológica de Cartagena, Cartagena, Colombia. 5;  Faculty of Health, Department of Ophthalmology, Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga UNAB, Bucaramanga, Colombia 6;  Faculty of Health, Department of Surgery, Universidad Industrial de Santander UIS, Bucaramanga, Colombia 7;  Faculty of Health, Department of Ophthalmology, Fundación Universitaria en Ciencias de la Sald FUCS, Bogotá, Colombia 8;  Faculty of Health, Department of Ophthalmology, Universidad del Sinú, Cartagena, Colombia 9
Published in: Čes. a slov. Oftal., 82, 2026, No. Ahead of Print, p. 1-6
Category: Original Article
doi: https://doi.org/10.31348/2026/25

Overview

Aims: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of combined intravitreal steroid and anti-VEGF treatment in patients with retinal vein occlusion at an  ophthalmological referral center in Colombia. Material and Methods: This is an analytical, longitudinal study of patients with macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion, who underwent treatment of combined intravitreal steroid and Anti-VEGF therapy at the Ophthalmology Department’s Retina and Vitreous Unit, collected from an anonymized database. Results: The study included 39 eyes from an anonymized secondary source, from January 2016 to December 2024. After an average follow-up of 18.7 months, a significant improvement in best-corrected visual acuity (from 1.22 to 0.93 LogMAR, p = 0.01) and a statistically significant reduction in central macular thickness (CMT) (from 567.5 to 236 μm, p = 0.01) were observed, with 76.9% of patients achieving a CMT < 300 μm. Intraocular pressure remained stable (15.18 vs. 15.69 mmHg). Most patients received Bevacizumab (64%) and Triamcinolone (66%), and 67% required intravitreal reinjections. The central retinal vein occlusion group showed visual improvement and a decrease in CMT, although 24% experienced complications, mainly elevated intraocular pressure and cataract progression. The superotemporal vein occlusion and inferotemporal vein occlusion groups also showed visual improvement and a reduction in CMT, with few complications. Conclusion: Combination therapy was effective in improving visual function and reducing macular edema in different types of retinal vein occlusion. Key words: retinal vein occlusion, macular edema, intravitreal injections, Ranibizumab, Aflibercept, Bevacizumab, Triamcinolone, Dexamethasone


Labels
Ophthalmology

Article was published in

Czech and Slovak Ophthalmology

Issue Ahead of Print

2026 Issue Ahead of Print

Most read in this issue
Login
Forgotten password

Enter the email address that you registered with. We will send you instructions on how to set a new password.

Login

Don‘t have an account?  Create new account

#ADS_BOTTOM_SCRIPTS#