Authors: Z. Mach; J. Regent; K. Hroníková; L. Mrklas Authors‘ workplace: Výzkumný ústav stomatologický VFN, Praha, přednosta doc. MUDr. O. Krejsa, CSc. Published in: Česká stomatologie / Praktické zubní lékařství, ročník , 2001, 4, s. 132-140 Category:
The work follows up in the previous article published in this journal (2/1999).The authors inform about clinical and laboratory evaluation of bonded and non-bondedamalgam restorations up to six years of clinical service. 75 bonded and 62 non-bonded amalgamrestorations and 11 seals were evaluated using modified USPHS criteria. In-vitro evaluationhas compared marginal steps to a standard set of Simulated restorations, and calculated theIndex of Marginal Fracture. Statistical analysis of clinical and laboratory results showed nosignificant differences between both techniques.
Key words: restorative dentistry – amalgam – bonded amalgam restoration
Don‘t have an account? Create new account
Enter the email address that you registered with. We will send you instructions on how to set a new password.
