Validation of the Czech Movement Imagery Questionnaire-Revised Second Version in stroke survivors
Authors:
Haltmar- H. 1 3; Janura M. 1; Elfmark M. 1
Authors‘ workplace:
Katedra přírodních věd v kinantropologii, Fakulta tělesné kultury, Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci
1; Ústav klinické rehabilitace, Fakulta zdravotnických věd, Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci
2; Oddělení rehabilitace, Fakultní nemocnice Olomouc
3
Published in:
Rehabil. fyz. Lék., 30, 2023, No. 4, pp. 172-182.
Category:
Original Papers
doi:
https://doi.org/10.48095/ccrhfl 2023172
Overview
Motor imagery may be a useful adjunct to conventional physiotherapy in stroke survivors as it leads to improved movement execution through facilitation of motor learning. However, before implementing motor imagery in therapy, it is desirable to clarify whether the patient has the capacity for this type of training. Motor imagery capacity in stroke survivors is tested, among others, by the Movement Imagery Questionnaire-Revised Second Version (MIQ-RS). The aim of the present study is to develop the Czech MIQ-RS for stroke survivors and to verify its reliability and validity. The reliability of the MIQ-RS for stroke survivors was very good in terms of internal consistency (Cronbach‘s alpha 0.91–0.94) and acceptable in terms of test-retest repeatability (interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) 0.59–0.91). Furthermore, the two-factor structure of the questionnaire containing visual and kinesthetic scales was confirmed. The Czech MIQ-RS is a reliable and valid indicator of the ability to imagine movement in subacute stroke survivors and is therefore suitable for use in clinical practice.
Keywords:
Movement Imagery Questionnaire-Revised Second Version – motor imagery – stroke – validation
Sources
1. Murray CJ, Vos T, Lozano R et al. Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 291 diseases and injuries in 21 regions, 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 2012; 380(9859): 2197–2223. doi: 10.1016/ S0140-6736(12)61689-4.
2. Mayo NE, Wood-Dauphinee S, Ahmed S et al. Disablement following stroke. Disabil Rehabil 1999; 21(5–6): 258–268. doi: 10.1080/ 09638 2899297684.
3. Jeannerod M. The representing brain: neural correlates of motor intention and imagery. Behav Brain Sci 1994; 17(2): 187–202. doi: 10.1017/ S0140525X00034026.
4. Mulder T. Motor imagery and action observation: cognitive tools for rehabilitation. J Neural Transm 2007; 114(10): 1265–1278. doi: 10.1007/ s00702-007-0763-z.
5. Bakker M, de Lange FP, Stevens JA et al. Motor imagery of gait: a quantitative approach. Exp Brain Res 2007; 179(3): 497–504. doi: 10.1007/ s00221-006-0807-x.
6. Haltmar H, Kolářová B, Haltmar M et al. Představa pohybu – neurální podstata a možnosti jejího využití ve fyzioterapii. Rehabil Fyz Lek 2022; 29(3): 130–135. doi: 10.48095/ ccrhfl2022130.
7. Hardwick RM, Caspers S, Eickhoff SB et al. Neural correlates of action: comparing meta-analyses of imagery, observation, and execution. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2018; 94: 31–44. doi: 10.1016/ j.neubiorev.2018.08.003.
8. Hétu S, Grégoire M, Saimpont A et al. The neural network of motor imagery: an ALE meta-analysis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2013; 37(5): 930–949. doi: 10.1016/ j.neubiorev.2013.03.017.
9. Ruffino C, Papaxanthis C, Lebon F. Neural plasticity during motor learning with motor imagery practice: review and perspectives. Neuroscience 2017; 341: 61–78. doi: 10.1016/ j.neuroscience.2016.11.023.
10. Harris JE, Hebert A. Utilization of motor imagery in upper limb rehabilitation: a systematic scoping review. Clin Rehabil 2015; 29(11): 1092–1107. doi: 10.1177/ 0269215514566248.
11. Zimmermann-Schlatter A, Schuster C, Puhan MA et al. Efficacy of motor imagery in post-stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2008; 5: 8. doi: 10.1186/ 1743-0003-5-8.
12. Gregg M, Hall C, Butler A. The MIQ-RS: a suitable option for examining movement imagery ability. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2010; 7(2): 249–257. doi: 10.1093/ ecam/ nem170.
13. Page SJ, Levine P, Leonard A. Mental practice in chronic stroke: results of a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Stroke 2007; 38(4): 1293–1297. doi: 10.1161/ 01.STR.000026 0205.67 348.2b.
14. Hall CR, Martin KA. Measuring movement imagery abilities: a revision of the Movement Imagery Questionnaire. J Ment Imagery 1997; 21(1–2): 143–154.
15. Malouin F, Richards CL, Jackson PL et al. The Kinesthetic and Visual Imagery Questionnaire (KVIQ) for assessing motor imagery in persons with physical disabilities: a reliability and construct validity study. J Neurol Phys Ther 2007; 31(1): 20–29. doi: 10.1097/ 01.npt.0000260567. 24122.64.
16. Mehrholz J, Thomas S, Elsner B. Treadmill training and body weight support for walking after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; 8(8): CD002840. doi: 10.1002/ 14651858.CD002840.pub4.
17. Butler AJ, Cazeaux J, Fidler A et al. The Movement Imagery Questionnaire-Revised, Second Edition (MIQ-RS) is a reliable and valid tool for evaluating motor imagery in stroke populations. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2012; 2012: 497289. doi: 10.1155/ 2012/ 497289.
18. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. „Mini-mental state“. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975; 12(3): 189–198. doi: 10.1016/ 0022-3956(75)90026-6.
19. Fugl-Meyer AR, Jääskö L, Leyman I et al. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med 1975; 7(1): 13–31.
20. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1(8476): 307–310.
21. Vincent WJ. Statistics in kinesiology. Human Kinetics, Champaign 1995.
22. Tavakol M, Dennick R. Making sense of Cronbach‘s alpha. Int J Med Educ 2011; 2: 53–55. doi: 10.5116/ ijme.4dfb.8dfd.
23. Merenda PF. A guide to the proper use of factor analysis in the conduct and reporting of research: pitfalls to avoid. Meas Eval Couns Dev 1997; 30(3): 156–164.
24. Loison B, Moussaddaq AS, Cormier J et al. Translation and validation of the French Movement Imagery Questionnaire-Revised, Second Version (MIQ-RS). Ann Phys Rehabil Med 2013; 56(3): 157–173. doi: 10.1016/ j.rehab.2013.01. 001.
25. Lorant J, Nicolas N. Validation de la traduction Française du Movement Imagery Questionnaire-Revised (MIQ-R). Sci Motricite 2010; 53(53): 57–68. doi: 10.3917/ sm.053.0057.
(Movement Imagery Questionnaire-Revised Second Version – MIQ-RS)
Labels
Physiotherapist, university degree Rehabilitation Sports medicineArticle was published in
Rehabilitation and Physical Medicine
2023 Issue 4
Most read in this issue
- Professional voice disorders and possibilities of treatment
- Comparison of methodologies in degenerative changes of the cervical spine
- Validation of the Czech Movement Imagery Questionnaire-Revised Second Version in stroke survivors
- Evaluation of the effect of complex rehabilitation care for children with cerebral palsy after the first year of operation of the new code OD 0035 in Sanatoria Klimkovice