Resource consumption of multi-substance users in the emergency room: A neglected patient group

Autoři: Laurence Klenk aff001;  Christina von Rütte aff001;  Jonathan F. Henssler aff002;  Thomas C. Sauter aff001;  Wolf E. Hautz aff001;  Aristomenis K. Exadaktylos aff001;  Martin Müller aff001
Působiště autorů: Department of Emergency Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland aff001;  Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, St. Hedwig Hospital Berlin, Charité University Medicine, Berlin, Germany aff002;  Medical Skills Lab, Charité Medical School Berlin, Berlin, Germany aff003;  Institute of Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, Cologne University Hospital, Cologne, Germany aff004
Vyšlo v časopise: PLoS ONE 14(9)
Kategorie: Research Article
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223118



Multi-substance use is accompanied by increased morbidity and mortality and responsible for a large number of emergency department (ED) consultations. To improve the treatment for this vulnerable group of patients, it is important to quantify and break down in detail the ED resources used during the ED treatment of multi-substance users.


This retrospective single centre case-control study included all ED consultations of multi-substance users over a three-year study period at a university hospital in Switzerland. Resource consumption of these patients was compared to an age-matched control group of non-multi-substance users.


The analysis includes 867 ED consultations of multi-substance users compared to 4,335 age-matched controls (5:1). Multi-substance users needed more total resources (median tax points [medical currency] (IQR): 762 (459–1226) vs. 462 (196–833), p<0.001), especially physician, radiology, and laboratory resources. This difference persisted in multivariable analysis (geometric mean ratio (GMR) 1.2, 95% CI: 1.1–1.3, p = 0.001) adjusted for sociodemographic parameters, consultation characteristics, and patient comorbidity; the GMR was highest in ED laboratory and radiology resource consumption. Among multi-substance user, indirect and non-drug-related consultations had higher ED resource consumption compared to drug-related consultations. Furthermore, leading discipline as well as urgency were predictors of ED resource consumption. Moreover, multi-substance users had more revisits (55.2% vs. 24.9%, p<0.001) as well as longer ED and in-hospital stays (both: GMR 1.2, 95% CI: 1.1–1.3, p<0.001).


ED consultations of multi-substance users are expensive and resource intensive. Multi-substance users visited the ED more often and stayed longer at the ED and in-hospital. The findings of our study underline the importance of this patient group. Additional efforts should be made to improve their ED care. Special interventions should target this patient group in order to decrease the high frequency and costs of emergency consultations caused by multi-substance users.

Klíčová slova:

Computed axial tomography – Critical care and emergency medicine – Intensive care units – Physicians – Radiology and imaging – Resuscitation – Drug users


1. Iwanicki JL, Severtson SG, McDaniel H, Rosenblum A, Fong C, Cicero TJ, et al. Abuse and Diversion of Immediate Release Opioid Analgesics as Compared to Extended Release Formulations in the United States. PLoS ONE. 2016;11: e0167499. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167499 27936038

2. Peacock A, Leung J, Larney S, Colledge S, Hickman M, Rehm J, et al. Global statistics on alcohol, tobacco and illicit drug use: 2017 status report. Addiction. 2018; doi: 10.1111/add.14234 29749059

3. Mokhlesi B, Garimella PS, Joffe A, Velho V. Street drug abuse leading to critical illness. Intensive Care Med. 2004;30: 1526–1536. doi: 10.1007/s00134-004-2229-1 14999443

4. Calder KK, Severyn FA. Surgical emergencies in the intravenous drug user. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2003;21: 1089–1116. 14708820

5. Fairbairn N, Wood E, Stoltz J-A, Li K, Montaner J, Kerr T. Crystal methamphetamine use associated with non-fatal overdose among a cohort of injection drug users in Vancouver. Public Health. 2008;122: 70–78. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2007.02.016 17645904

6. Macias Konstantopoulos WL, Dreifuss JA, McDermott KA, Parry BA, Howell ML, Mandler RN, et al. Identifying patients with problematic drug use in the emergency department: results of a multisite study. Ann Emerg Med. 2014;64: 516–525. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.05.012 24999283

7. Krupski A, West II, Graves MC, Atkins DC, Maynard C, Bumgardner K, et al. Clinical Needs of Patients with Problem Drug Use. J Am Board Fam Med. 2015;28: 605–616. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2015.05.150004 26355132

8. Vu F, Daeppen J-B, Hugli O, Iglesias K, Stucki S, Paroz S, et al. Screening of mental health and substance users in frequent users of a general Swiss emergency department. BMC Emerg Med. 2015;15: 27. doi: 10.1186/s12873-015-0053-2 26452550

9. Genell Andrén K, Rosenqvist U. Heavy users of an emergency department—a two year follow-up study. Soc Sci Med. 1987;25: 825–831. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(87)90040-2 3686111

10. Stein MD, O’Sullivan PS, Ellis P, Perrin H, Wartenberg A. Utilization of medical services by drug abusers in detoxification. J Subst Abuse. 1993;5: 187–193. 8104569

11. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality. The DAWN Report: Highlights of the 2011 Drug Abuse Warning Network (DAWN) Findings on Drug-Related Emergency Department Visits [Internet]. 22 Feb 2013 [cited 17 Jan 2019]. Available:

12. Kerr T, Wood E, Grafstein E, Ishida T, Shannon K, Lai C, et al. High rates of primary care and emergency department use among injection drug users in Vancouver. J Public Health (Oxf). 2005;27: 62–66. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdh189 15564279

13. Woodruff SI, McCabe CT, Hohman M, Clapp JD, Shillington AM, Eisenberg K, et al. Characteristics of Cannabis-Only and Other Drug Users Who Visit the Emergency Department. Cannabis Cannabinoid Res. 2016;1: 149–153. doi: 10.1089/can.2016.0012 27689138

14. Day C. Benzodiazepines in Combination with Opioid Pain Relievers or Alcohol: Greater Risk of More Serious ED Visit Outcomes. The CBHSQ Report. Rockville (MD): Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (US); 2013. Available:

15. Rutschmann OT, Hugli OW, Marti C, Grosgurin O, Geissbuhler A, Kossovsky M, et al. Reliability of the revised Swiss Emergency Triage Scale: a computer simulation study. European Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2018;25: 264–269. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000449 28099182

16. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40: 373–383. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8 3558716

17. Ioannidis JPA. Lowering the P Value Threshold—Reply. JAMA. 2018;320: 937. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.8743 30193273

18. Des Jarlais DC, Kerr T, Carrieri P, Feelemyer J, Arasteh K. HIV infection among persons who inject drugs: ending old epidemics and addressing new outbreaks. AIDS. 2016;30: 815–826. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000001039 26836787

19. Curran GM, Sullivan G, Williams K, Han X, Collins K, Keys J, et al. Emergency department use of persons with comorbid psychiatric and substance abuse disorders. Ann Emerg Med. 2003;41: 659–667. doi: 10.1067/mem.2003.154 12712033

20. Hawk K, D’Onofrio G. Emergency department screening and interventions for substance use disorders. Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2018;13: 18. doi: 10.1186/s13722-018-0117-1 30078375

21. Mamede S, Van Gog T, Schuit SCE, Van den Berge K, Van Daele PLA, Bueving H, et al. Why patients’ disruptive behaviours impair diagnostic reasoning: a randomised experiment. BMJ Quality & Safety. 2017;26: 13–18. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-005065 26951796

22. Schmidt HG, van Gog T, CE Schuit S, Van den Berge K, LA Van Daele P, Bueving H, et al. Do patients’ disruptive behaviours influence the accuracy of a doctor’s diagnosis? A randomised experiment: Table 1. BMJ Quality & Safety. 2017;26: 19–23. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004109 26951795

23. Bergen SE, Gardner CO, Aggen SH, Kendler KS. Socioeconomic Status and Social Support Following Illicit Drug Use: Causal Pathways or Common Liability? Twin Res Hum Genet. 2008;11: 266–274. doi: 10.1375/twin.11.3.266 18498205

24. Cheung A, Somers JM, Moniruzzaman A, Patterson M, Frankish CJ, Krausz M, et al. Emergency department use and hospitalizations among homeless adults with substance dependence and mental disorders. Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2015;10: 17. doi: 10.1186/s13722-015-0038-1 26242968

25. Nohl F, Kohler H-P. [Addiction patients in emergency departments]. Ther Umsch. 2014;71: 617–621. doi: 10.1024/0040-5930/a000601 25257116

26. Bertholet N. Reduction of Alcohol Consumption by Brief Alcohol Intervention in Primary Care: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Archives of Internal Medicine. 2005;165: 986. doi: 10.1001/archinte.165.9.986 15883236

27. O’Connor PG, Sokol RJ, D’Onofrio G. Addiction Medicine: The Birth of a New Discipline. JAMA Internal Medicine. 2014;174: 1717. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.4211 25201642

28. Elliott K, W Klein J, Basu A, Sabbatini AK. Transitional care clinics for follow-up and primary care linkage for patients discharged from the ED. Am J Emerg Med. 2016;34: 1230–1235. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2016.03.029 27066931

Článek vyšel v časopise


2019 Číslo 9