1. Daniel J. Making sense of MOOCs: Musings in a maze of myth, paradox and possibility. Journal of Interactive Media in Education. 2012;2012(3):18.
2. Pappano L. The year of the MOOC 2012 [cited 2019 04/21]. Available from: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/04/education/edlife/massive-open-online-courses-are-multiplying-at-a-rapid-pace.html.
3. Clow D. MOOCs and the funnel of participation. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge; 2013: ACM.
4. Kop R. The challenges to connectivist learning on open online networks: Learning experiences during a massive open online course. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. 2011;12(3):19–38.
5. Siemens G. Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology & Distance Learning. 2005;2(1):3–10.
6. Yang D, Sinha T, Adamson D, Rosé CP. Turn on, tune in, drop out: Anticipating student dropouts in massive open online courses. Proceedings of the 2013 NIPS Data-Driven Education Workshop; 2013; Nevada, USA: NIPS.
7. Knox J. Digital culture clash:“Massive” education in the e-learning and digital cultures MOOC. Distance Education. 2014;35(2):164–77.
8. Alavi M, Leidner DE. Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quarterly. 2001;25(1):107–36.
9. Jarvenpaa SL, Majchrzak A. Research commentary—Vigilant interaction in knowledge collaboration: Challenges of online user participation under ambivalence. Information Systems Research. 2010;21(4):773–84.
10. Kankanhalli A, Tan BC, Wei K-K. Contributing knowledge to electronic knowledge repositories: An empirical investigation. MIS Quarterly. 2005;29(1):113–43.
11. Wasko MM, Faraj S. Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. MIS Quarterly. 2005;29(1):35–57.
12. Dickey MD. Engaging by design: How engagement strategies in popular computer and video games can inform instructional design. Educational Technology Research and Development. 2005;53(2):67–83.
13. Gutierrez FJ, Ochoa SF, Zurita G, Baloian N. Understanding student participation in undergraduate course communities: A case study. Information Systems Frontiers. 2016;18(1):7–21.
14. Liu D, Li X, Santhanam R. Digital games and beyond: What happens when players compete? MIS Quarterly. 2013;37(1):111–24.
15. Looyestyn J, Kernot J, Boshoff K, Ryan J, Edney S, Maher C. Does gamification increase engagement with online programs? A systematic review. PLoS ONE 2017;12(3): e0173403. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173403 28362821
16. Fu F-L, Wu Y-L, Ho H-C. An investigation of coopetitive pedagogic design for knowledge creation in Web-based learning. Computers & Education. 2009;53(3):550–62.
17. Afuah A, Tucci CL. Crowdsourcing as a solution to distant search. Academy of Management Review. 2012;37(3):355–75.
18. Tsai W. Social structure of "coopetition" within a multiunit organization: Coordination, competition, and intraorganizational knowledge sharing. Organization Science. 2002;13(2):179–90.
19. Wang M. Integrating organizational, social, and individual perspectives in Web 2.0-based workplace e-learning. Information Systems Frontiers. 2011;13(2):191–205.
20. Mackness J, Mak S, Williams R. The ideals and reality of participating in a MOOC. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Networked Learning; 2010; Lancaster, UK.
21. Saadatdoost R, Sim ATH, Jafarkarimi H, Mei Hee J. Exploring MOOC from education and Information Systems perspectives: A short literature review. Educational Review. 2015;67(4):505–18.
22. Fini A. The technological dimension of a massive open online course: The case of the CCK08 course tools. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. 2009;10(5):74–99.
23. Rodriguez CO. MOOCs and the AI-Stanford Like Courses: Two Successful and Distinct Course Formats for Massive Open Online Courses. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning. 2012;14(2):202–27.
24. Fox A, Patterson D. Crossing the software education chasm. Communications of the ACM. 2012;55(5):44–9.
25. Adamopoulos P. What makes a great MOOC? An interdisciplinary analysis of student retention in online courses. Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Information Systems; 2013; Milano, Italy: AIS.
26. Jordan K. Initial trends in enrolment and completion of massive open online courses. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. 2014;15(1):133–60.
27. Lee Y, Choi J. A review of online course dropout research: Implications for practice and future research. Educational Technology Research and Development. 2011;59(5):593–618.
28. Kizilcec RF, Piech C, Schneider E. Deconstructing disengagement: analyzing learner subpopulations in massive open online courses. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge; 2013; Leuven, Belgium: ACM.
29. Onah DF, Sinclair J, Boyatt R. Dropout rates of massive open online courses: behavioural patterns. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies; 2014; Barcelona, Spain: Education and Development
30. Coetzee D, Fox A, Hearst MA, Hartmann B. Should your MOOC forum use a reputation system? Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing; 2014; Baltimore, MD, USA: ACM.
31. Spann M, Skiera B. Internet-based virtual stock markets for business forecasting. Management Science. 2003;49(10):1310–26.
32. Fama EF. Efficient capital markets: II. Journal of Finance. 1991;46(5):1575–617.
33. Hayek FA. The use of knowledge in society. American Economic Review. 1945;35(4):519–30.
34. Smith VL. Markets as economizers of information: Experimental examination of the “Hayek hypothesis”. Economic Inquiry. 1982;20(2):165–79.
35. Chen L, Goes P, Marsden JR, Zhang Z. Design and use of preference markets for evaluation of early stage technologies. Journal of Management Information Systems. 2009;26(3):45–70.
36. Servan‐Schreiber E, Wolfers J, Pennock DM, Galebach B. Prediction markets: Does money matter? Electronic Markets. 2004;14(3):243–51.
37. Dahan E, Soukhoroukova A, Spann M. New product development 2.0: Preference markets—How scalable securities markets identify winning product concepts and attributes. Journal of Product Innovation Management. 2010;27(7):937–54.
38. Graefe A. Prediction markets—Defining events and motivating participation. Foresight-The International Journal of Applied Forecasting. 2008;9(2):30–2.
39. Forsythe R, Nelson F, Neumann GR, Wright J. Anatomy of an experimental political stock market. American Economic Review. 1992;82(5):1142–61.
40. Ostrover S. Employing information markets to achieve truly collaborative sales forecasting. Journal of Business Forecasting. 2005;24(1):9–12.
41. Spann M, Skiera B. Sports Forecasting: A Comparison of the Forecast Accuracy of Prediction Markets, Betting Odds and Tipsters. Journal of Forecasting. 2009;28(1):55–72.
42. Almenberg J, Kittlitz K, Pfeiffer T. An experiment on prediction markets in science. PLoS One. 2009;4(12):e8500. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008500 20041139
43. Soukhoroukova A, Spann M. Sourcing, filtering, and evaluating new product ideas: An empirical exploration of the performance of idea markets. Journal of Product Innovation Management 2012;29(1):100–12.
44. Heusler A, Spann M. Knowledge stock exchanges: A co-opetitive crowdsourcing mechanism for e-learning. Proceedings of the European Conference on Information Systems; 2014; Tel-Aviv, Israel: AIS.
45. Poetz MK, Schreier M. The value of crowdsourcing: can users really compete with professionals in generating new product ideas? Journal of Product Innovation Management. 2012;29(2):245–56.
46. Deci EL, Ryan RM. Handbook of self-determination research: University Rochester Press; 2004.
47. Festinger L. A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations. 1954;7(2):117–40.
48. Bower J, Bunn D. Experimental analysis of the efficiency of uniform-price versus discriminatory auctions in the England and Wales electricity market. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control. 2001;25(3–4):561–92.
49. Hanson R. Combinatorial information market design. Information Systems Frontiers. 2003;5(1):107–19.
50. Othman A, Pennock DM, Reeves DM, Sandholm T. A practical liquidity-sensitive automated market maker. Proceedings of the 11th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce; 2010; Cambridge, MA, USA: ACM.
51. Slamka C, Skiera B, Spann M. Prediction market performance and market liquidity: A comparison of automated market makers. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. 2013;60(1):169–85.
52. Berg JE, Rietz TA. Prediction markets as decision support systems. Information Systems Frontiers. 2003;5(1):79–93.
53. The Augmented Trader. MOOC Student Demographics 2013 [cited 2019 07/02]. Available from: https://augmentedtrader.com/2013/01/27/mooc-student-demographics/.
54. Emanuel EJ. Online education: MOOCs taken by educated few. Nature. 2013;503(7476):342.
55. Shaver JM. Accounting for endogeneity when assessing strategy performance: does entry mode choice affect FDI survival? Management Science. 1998;44(4):571–85.
56. Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika. 1983;70(1):41–55.
57. Heckman JJ, Ichimura H, Todd P. Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator. Review of Economic Studies. 1998;65(2):261–94.
58. Dehejia RH, Wahba S. Propensity score-matching methods for nonexperimental causal studies. Review of Economics and Statistics. 2002;84(1):151–61.
59. Mithas S, Krishnan MS. From association to causation via a potential outcomes approach. Information Systems Research. 2009;20(2):295–313.
60. Imbens GW. Nonparametric estimation of average treatment effects under exogeneity: A review. Review of Economics and Statistics. 2004;86(1):4–29.
61. Morita JG, Lee TW, Mowday RT. The regression-analog to survival analysis: A selected application to turnover research. Academy of Management Journal. 1993;36(6):1430–64.
62. Singer JD, Willett JB. It’s about time: Using discrete-time survival analysis to study duration and the timing of events. Journal of Educational Statistics. 1993;18(2):155–95.
63. Wager S, Athey S. Estimation and inference of heterogeneous treatment effects using random forests. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 2018;113(523):1228–42.