Affective and enjoyment responses to 12 weeks of high intensity interval training and moderate continuous training in adults with Crohn’s disease

English version

Autoři: Lindsay Bottoms ^aff001; Dean Leighton ^aff002; Roger Carpenter ^aff003; Simon Anderson ^aff004; Louise Langmead ^aff005; John Ramage ^aff006; James Faulkner ^aff007; Elizabeth Coleman ^aff008; Caroline Fairhurst ^aff008; Michael Seed ^aff003; Garry Tew ^aff009
Působiště autorů: Department of Psychology and Sports Science, University of Hertfordshire, Life and Medical Sciences, Hatfield, United Kingdom ^aff001; Centre for Immunobiology, Queen Mary University of London, Whitechapel, London ^aff002; School of Health, Sport and Bioscience, University of East London, Stratford Campus, London, United Kingdom ^aff003; Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom ^aff004; Digestive Diseases Clinical Academic Unit, Barts and the London NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom ^aff005; Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Hampshire, United Kingdom ^aff006; Department of Sport, Exercise and Health, University of Winchester, Winchester, United Kingdom ^aff007; York Trials Unit, University of York, Heslington, York ^aff008; Department of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, Northumbria University, Newcastle, United Kingdom ^aff009
Vyšlo v časopise: PLoS ONE 14(9)
Kategorie: Research Article
doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222060

Souhrn

The aim was to undertake secondary data analysis from a three-arm randomised feasibility trial of high intensity interval training (HIIT), moderate intensity continuous training (MICT), and usual care control in adults with Crohn’s disease (CD; n = 36), with a primary focus on exploring affective and enjoyment responses. Twenty-five participants with quiescent or mildly-active CD were randomised to one of the two exercise groups: HIIT (n = 13) and MICT (n = 12). Both groups were offered thrice weekly sessions for 12 weeks. MICT consisted of cycling for 30 minutes at 35% peak power (Wpeak), whereas HIIT involved ten 1-minute bouts at 90% Wpeak, interspersed with 1-minute bouts at 15% Wpeak. Heart rate (HR), differentiated ratings of perceived exertion for legs (RPE-L) and central (RPE-C), along with feeling state (Feeling Scale; FS) were measured at 92.5% of each session. Enjoyment was measured at the end of training using the Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale (PACES). Post-hoc exploratory analysis involved a mixed-model two-way ANOVA to compare HR, RPE-L, RPE-C and FS for the exercise sessions in weeks 1, 6 and 12 between groups. Overall, HR was greater (p < 0.01) during HIIT (173 ± 8 bpm) compared with MICT (128 ± 6 bpm). Similarly, RPE-L and RPE-C responses were greater overall (p = 0.03 and p = 0.03, respectively) during HIIT (5.5 ± 1.6 and 5.1 ± 1.7, respectively) compared to MICT (3.3 ± 1.5 and 2.9 ± 1.5, respectively). Overall, FS was 2.2 ± 1.9 for HIIT and 2.1 ± 1.4 for MICT with no effect of treatment group (p = 0.25) or time (p = 0.94). There was also no significant difference in PACES scores between HIIT (99.4 ± 12.9) and MICT (101.3 ± 17.4; p = 0.78). The findings suggest HIIT and MICT protocols elicited similar enjoyment and affect in adults with quiescent or mildly-active CD.

Klíčová slova:

Medicine and health sciences – Public and occupational health – Physical activity – Physical fitness – Cardiology – Heart rate – Clinical medicine – Clinical immunology – Autoimmune diseases – Crohn's disease – Immunology – Gastroenterology and hepatology – Inflammatory bowel disease – Bone – Bone density – Diagnostic medicine – Signs and symptoms – Fatigue – Pathology and laboratory medicine – Biology and life sciences – Sports science – Sports and exercise medicine – Exercise – Anatomy – Biological tissue – Connective tissue – Research and analysis methods – Mathematical and statistical techniques – Statistical methods – Analysis of variance – Physical sciences – Mathematics – Statistics

Zdroje

1. Bilski J, Brzozowski B, Mazur-Bialy A, Sliwowski Z, Brzozowski T. The role of physical exercise in inflammatory bowel disease. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:429031. doi: 10.1155/2014/429031 24877092.

2. Wiroth JB, Filippi J, Schneider SM, Al-Jaouni R, Horvais N, Gavarry O, et al. Muscle performance in patients with Crohn's disease in clinical remission. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2005;11(3):296–303. doi: 10.1097/01.mib.0000160810.76729.9c 15735436.

3. Schneider SM, Al-Jaouni R, Filippi J, Wiroth JB, Zeanandin G, Arab K, et al. Sarcopenia is prevalent in patients with Crohn's disease in clinical remission. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2008;14(11):1562–8. doi: 10.1002/ibd.20504 18478564.

4. Gajendran M, Loganathan P, Catinella AP, Hashash JG. A comprehensive review and update on Crohn's disease. Disease-a-month: DM. 2018;64(2):20–57. doi: 10.1016/j.disamonth.2017.07.001 28826742.

5. Luces C, Bodger K. Economic burden of inflammatory bowel disease: a UK perspective. Expert review of pharmacoeconomics & outcomes research. 2006;6(4):471–82. doi: 10.1586/14737167.6.4.471 20528516.

6. Torres J, Mehandru S, Colombel JF, Peyrin-Biroulet L. Crohn's disease. Lancet. 2017;389(10080):1741–55. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31711-1 27914655.

7. Pedersen BK, Saltin B. Evidence for prescribing exercise as therapy in chronic disease. Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports. 2006;16 Suppl 1:3–63. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2006.00520.x 16451303.

8. Ng V, Millard W, Lebrun C, Howard J. Low-intensity exercise improves quality of life in patients with Crohn's disease. Clin J Sport Med. 2007;17(5):384–8. 17873551.

9. Loudon CP, Corroll V, Butcher J, Rawsthorne P, Bernstein CN. The effects of physical exercise on patients with Crohn's disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;94(3):697–703. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.1999.00939.x 10086654.

10. Klare P, Nigg J, Nold J, Haller B, Krug AB, Mair S, et al. The impact of a ten-week physical exercise program on health-related quality of life in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Digestion. 2015;91(3):239–47. doi: 10.1159/000371795 25823689.

11. Health Do. Start active, stay active: a report on physical activity from the four home countries. London: Department of Health: 2011.

12. Gibala MJ, Little JP, Macdonald MJ, Hawley JA. Physiological adaptations to low-volume, high-intensity interval training in health and disease. J Physiol. 2012;590(Pt 5):1077–84. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2011.224725 22289907.

13. Nybo L, Sundstrup E, Jakobsen MD, Mohr M, Hornstrup T, Simonsen L, et al. High-intensity training versus traditional exercise interventions for promoting health. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010;42(10):1951–8. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181d99203 20195181.

14. Burgomaster KA, Howarth KR, Phillips SM, Rakobowchuk M, Macdonald MJ, McGee SL, et al. Similar metabolic adaptations during exercise after low volume sprint interval and traditional endurance training in humans. J Physiol. 2008;586(1):151–60. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2007.142109 17991697.

15. Thum JS, Parsons G, Whittle T, Astorino TA. High-Intensity Interval Training Elicits Higher Enjoyment than Moderate Intensity Continuous Exercise. PLoS One. 2017;12(1):e0166299. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166299 28076352.

16. Weston M, Taylor KL, Batterham AM, Hopkins WG. Effects of low-volume high-intensity interval training (HIT) on fitness in adults: a meta-analysis of controlled and non-controlled trials. Sports Med. 2014;44(7):1005–17. doi: 10.1007/s40279-014-0180-z 24743927.

17. Mijwel S, Jervaeus A, Bolam KA, Norrbom J, Bergh J, Rundqvist H, et al. High-intensity exercise during chemotherapy induces beneficial effects 12 months into breast cancer survivorship. Journal of cancer survivorship: research and practice. 2019. doi: 10.1007/s11764-019-00747-z 30912010.

18. Minghetti A, Faude O, Hanssen H, Zahner L, Gerber M, Donath L. Sprint interval training (SIT) substantially reduces depressive symptoms in major depressive disorder (MDD): A randomized controlled trial. Psychiatry research. 2018;265:292–7. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.04.053 29775886.

19. Oliveira BRR, Santos TM, Kilpatrick M, Pires FO, Deslandes AC. Affective and enjoyment responses in high intensity interval training and continuous training: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2018;13(6):e0197124. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197124 29874256.

20. Bartlett JD, Close GL, MacLaren DP, Gregson W, Drust B, Morton JP. High-intensity interval running is perceived to be more enjoyable than moderate-intensity continuous exercise: implications for exercise adherence. Journal of sports sciences. 2011;29(6):547–53. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2010.545427 21360405.

21. Jung ME, Bourne JE, Little JP. Where does HIT fit? An examination of the affective response to high-intensity intervals in comparison to continuous moderate- and continuous vigorous-intensity exercise in the exercise intensity-affect continuum. PLoS One. 2014;9(12):e114541. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114541 25486273.

22. Kong Z, Fan X, Sun S, Song L, Shi Q, Nie J. Comparison of High-Intensity Interval Training and Moderate-to-Vigorous Continuous Training for Cardiometabolic Health and Exercise Enjoyment in Obese Young Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial. PLoS One. 2016;11(7):e0158589. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158589 27368057.

23. Oliveira BR, Slama FA, Deslandes AC, Furtado ES, Santos TM. Continuous and high-intensity interval training: which promotes higher pleasure? PLoS One. 2013;8(11):e79965. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079965 24302993.

24. Tew GA, Leighton D, Carpenter R, Anderson S, Langmead L, Ramage J, et al. High-intensity interval training and moderate-intensity continuous training in adults with Crohn's disease: a pilot randomised controlled trial. BMC gastroenterology. 2019;19(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s12876-019-0936-x 30696423.

25. Tew GA, Carpenter R, Seed M, Anderson S, Langmead L, Fairhurst C, et al. Feasibility of high-intensity interval training and moderate-intensity continuous training in adults with inactive or mildly active Crohn's disease: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2017;3:17. Epub 2017/04/03. doi: 10.1186/s40814-017-0133-z 28373911.

26. ACSM. ACSM's guidelines for exercise testing and prescription. Eighth ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins:; 2009.

27. Little JP, Jung ME, Wright AE, Wright W, Manders RJ. Effects of high-intensity interval exercise versus continuous moderate-intensity exercise on postprandial glycemic control assessed by continuous glucose monitoring in obese adults. Applied physiology, nutrition, and metabolism = Physiologie appliquee, nutrition et metabolisme. 2014;39(7):835–41. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2013-0512 24773254.

28. Borg GA. Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1982;14(5):377–81. Epub 1982/01/01. 7154893.

29. Hardy C, Rejeski W. Not what, but how one feels: the measurement of affect during exercise. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology. 1989;11:304–17.

30. Blanca MJ, Alarcon R, Arnau J, Bono R, Bendayan R. Non-normal data: Is ANOVA still a valid option? Psicothema. 2017;29(4):552–7. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2016.383 29048317.

31. Hopkins WG, Marshall SW, Batterham AM, Hanin J. Progressive statistics for studies in sports medicine and exercise science. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009;41(1):3–13. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31818cb278 19092709.

32. Tew GA, Jones K, Mikocka-Walus A. Physical Activity Habits, Limitations, and Predictors in People with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Large Cross-sectional Online Survey. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2016;22(12):2933–42. doi: 10.1097/MIB.0000000000000962 27824653.

33. Rhodes RE, Kates A. Can the Affective Response to Exercise Predict Future Motives and Physical Activity Behavior? A Systematic Review of Published Evidence. Annals of behavioral medicine: a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine. 2015;49(5):715–31. doi: 10.1007/s12160-015-9704-5 25921307.

34. Heisz JJ, Tejada MG, Paolucci EM, Muir C. Enjoyment for High-Intensity Interval Exercise Increases during the First Six Weeks of Training: Implications for Promoting Exercise Adherence in Sedentary Adults. PLoS One. 2016;11(12):e0168534. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168534 27973594.

35. Wisloff U, Ellingsen O, Kemi OJ. High-intensity interval training to maximize cardiac benefits of exercise training? Exercise and sport sciences reviews. 2009;37(3):139–46. doi: 10.1097/JES.0b013e3181aa65fc 19550205.

36. Vella CA, Taylor K, Drummer D. High-intensity interval and moderate-intensity continuous training elicit similar enjoyment and adherence levels in overweight and obese adults. European journal of sport science. 2017;17(9):1203–11. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2017.1359679 28792851.

37. Tew GA, Batterham AM, Colling K, Gray J, Kerr K, Kothmann E, et al. Randomized feasibility trial of high-intensity interval training before elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Br J Surg. 2017;104(13):1791–801. Epub 2017/10/09. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10669 28990651.

38. Biddle SJ, Batterham AM. High-intensity interval exercise training for public health: a big HIT or shall we HIT it on the head? Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015;12:95. doi: 10.1186/s12966-015-0254-9 26187579.

39. Malik AA, Williams CA, Bond B, Weston KL, Barker AR. Acute cardiorespiratory, perceptual and enjoyment responses to high-intensity interval exercise in adolescents. European journal of sport science. 2017;17(10):1335–42. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2017.1364300 28859545.

Affective and enjoyment responses to 12 weeks of high intensity interval training and moderate continuous training in adults with Crohn’s disease

Souhrn

Klíčová slova:

Zdroje

PLOS One

Svět praktické medicíny 1/2024 (znalostní test z časopisu)

Koncepce osteologické péče pro gynekology a praktické lékaře

Sekvenční léčba schizofrenie

Hypertenze a hypercholesterolémie – synergický efekt léčby

Význam metforminu pro „udržitelnou“ terapii diabetu